Localization and function of key axonemal microtubule inner proteins and dynein docking complex members reveal extensive diversity among vertebrate motile cilia
Hao Lu,Wang Kyaw Twan,Yayoi Ikawa,Vani Prem Khare,Ishita Mukherjee,Kai Xin Chua,Saikat Chakrabarti,Hiroshi Hamada,Sudipto Roy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.14.580281
2024-02-14
Abstract:Vertebrate motile cilia are broadly classified as (9+2) or (9+0), based on the presence or absence of the central pair apparatus, respectively. Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analyses of (9+2) cilia have uncovered an elaborate axonemal protein composition; whether these features are relevant to (9+0) cilia remain unclear. We previously demonstrated that Cfap53, a key microtubule inner protein (MIP) as well as centriolar-satellites component, is essential for motility of (9+0), but not (9+2) cilia. Here, we show that in (9+2) cilia, Cfap53 functions redundantly with a paralogous MIP, Mns1. Mns1 localizes to ciliary axonemes, and combined loss of both proteins in zebrafish and mice, caused severe loss of outer dynein arms (ODAs) of (9+2) cilia, significantly affecting their motility. Moreover, using immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that while Mns1 can self-associate and interact with Cfap53, Cfap53 is unable to self-associate. Finally, we show that multiple additional dynein interacting proteins, such as the ODA docking complex (ODA-DC) members, show strikingly distinct localization patterns between various motile cilia-types. Our findings clarify how paralogous MIPs, Cfap53 and Mns1, function in regulating motility of (9+2) versus (9+0) cilia, and establish that localization pattern of other key motility proteins also differ between these cilia-types, further emphasizing extensive structural variations among these organelles.
Developmental Biology