Folding Type‐specific Secondary Structure Propensities of Amino Acids, Derived from Α‐helical, Β‐sheet, Α/β, and Α+β Proteins of Known Structures
Bo Jiang,Tao Guo,Lei‐Wei Peng,Zhi‐Rong Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(199801)45:1<35::aid-bip4>3.0.co;2-#
1998-01-01
Biopolymers
Abstract:BiopolymersVolume 45, Issue 1 p. 35-49 Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of amino acids, derived from α-helical, β-sheet, α/β, and α+β proteins of known structures Bo Jiang, Corresponding Author Bo Jiang Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSchool of Economics, Peking University, 100871, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Guo, Tao Guo Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei-Wei Peng, Lei-Wei Peng Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-Rong Sun, Zhi-Rong Sun Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author Bo Jiang, Corresponding Author Bo Jiang Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSchool of Economics, Peking University, 100871, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Guo, Tao Guo Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei-Wei Peng, Lei-Wei Peng Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-Rong Sun, Zhi-Rong Sun Department of Biological, Sciences, and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 06 December 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199801)45:1<35::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-%23Citations: 16AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Folding type-specific secondary structure propensities of 20 naturally occurring amino acids have been derived from α-helical, β-sheet, α/β, and α+β proteins of known structures. These data show that each residue type of amino acids has intrinsic propensities in different regions of secondary structures for different folding types of proteins. Each of the folding types shows markedly different rank ordering, indicating folding type-specific effects on the secondary structure propensities of amino acids. Rigorous statistical tests have been made to validate the folding type-specific effects. It should be noted that α and β proteins have relatively small α-helices and β-strands forming propensities respectively compared with those of α+β and α/β proteins. This may suggest that, with more complex architectures than α and β proteins, α+β and α/β proteins require larger propensities to distinguish from interacting α-helices and β-strands. Our finding of folding type-specific secondary structure propensities suggests that sequence space accessible to each folding type may have differing features. Differing sequence space features might be constrained by topological requirement for each of the folding types. Almost all strong β-sheet forming residues are hydrophobic in character regardless of folding types, thus suggesting the hydrophobicities of side chains as a key determinant of β-sheet structures. In contrast, conformational entropy of side chains is a major determinant of the helical propensities of amino acids, although other interactions such as hydrophobicities and charged interactions cannot be neglected. These results will be helpful to protein design, class-based secondary structure prediction, and protein folding. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 45: 35–49, 1998 Citing Literature Volume45, Issue1January 1998Pages 35-49 RelatedInformation