Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Report in the Field of Breast Cancer Published in Chinese
毛蕾,张盼,丁界先,黄紫涵,杨文源,葛龙,田金徽
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.05.029
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To objectively assess the quality and potential problems of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) published in China in the field of breast cancer using 2010 CONSORT statement,in order to provide a reference for high - quality research in the future. Methods Retrieval was made in Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,Wanfang Database,China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP database from establishment to September 2013,with a searching strategy of(breast cancer OR breast tumor OR breast malignant tumor)AND( random). Data extraction table was designed based on 2010 CONSORT statement. Preliminary data extraction was made from 20 pieces of literature included by 2 researchers,and cross -check was made on the extracted data. After the 2 researchers reached consensus on items with divergence,they made assessment on the included literatures independently. Based on the accordance degree of the included literatures with each item of 2010 CONSORT statement,the literatures were assigned into " complete reports" and " incomplete report or no report". Results A total of 968 RCTs were included,the items with high rate of complete reports( ≥70% )were 2a(765 pieces, 79. 03% ),4a( 690 pieces,71. 28% ),5 ( 895 pieces,92. 46% ),13a ( 836 pieces,86. 36% ),21 ( 690 pieces, 71. 28% ),22(692 pieces,71. 49% ). There were a number of items with low complete report(≤10% ),such as 1a(10 pieces,1. 03% ),3b ( 15 pieces,1. 55% ),6b ( 5 pieces,0. 52% ),7b ( 2 pieces,0. 21% ),8b ( 79 pieces, 8. 16% ),9(20 pieces,2. 07% ),10(6 pieces,0. 62% ),11a(11 pieces,1. 14% ),12b(2 pieces,0. 21% ),14b (3 pieces,0. 31% ),17a(19 pieces,1. 96% ),17b(70 pieces,7. 23% ),18(9 pieces,0. 93% ),24(0 pieces)and 25(55 pieces,5. 68% ). From 2010,the complete report rates of item 2a,4b and 12a were higher than those before 2010(P﹤ 0. 05),and the complete report rate of item 19 was lower than that before 2010 ( P ﹤ 0. 05);other items were not significantly different in complete report rate(P ﹥ 0. 05). Conclusion The present reports of RCTs published in Chinese in the field of breast cancer is not in a good quality. The potential problems lie in the methods used to generate the random allocation sequence,allocation concealment mechanism and the process of blind method.