Actins from Plant and Animal Sources Tend Not to Form Heteropolymers in Vitro and Function Differently in Plant Cells.

Y Jing,K Yi,H Ren
2003-01-01
PROTOPLASMA
Abstract:Pollen and skeletal muscle actins were purified and labeled with fluorescent dyes that have different emission wavelengths. Observation by electron microscopy shows that the fluorescent actins are capable to polymerize into filamentous actin in vitro, bind to myosin S-1 fragments, and have a critical concentration similar to unlabeled actin, indicating that they are functionally active. The globular actins from two sources were mixed and polymerized by the addition of ATP and salts. The copolymerization experiment shows that when excited by light of the appropriate wavelength, both red actin filaments (pollen actin) and green actin filaments (muscle actin) can be visualized under the microscope, but no filaments exhibiting both green and red colors are detected. Furthermore, coprecipitations of labeled pollen actin with unlabeled pollen and skeletal muscle actin were performed. Measurements of fluorescent intensity show that the amount of labeled pollen actin precipitating with pollen actin was much higher than that with skeletal muscle actin, indicating that pollen and muscle actin tend not to form heteropolymers. Injection of labeled pollen actin into living stamen hair cells results in the formation of normal actin filaments in transvacuolar strands and the cortical cytoplasm. In contrast, labeled skeletal muscle actin has detrimental effects on the cellular architecture. The results from coinjection of the actin-disrupting reagent cytochalasin D with pollen actin show that overexpression of pollen actin prolongs the displacement of the nucleus and facilitates the recovery of the nuclear position, actin filament architecture, and transvacuolar strands. However, muscle actin perturbs actin filaments when injected into stamen hair cells. Moreover, nuclear displacement occurs more rapidly when cytochalasin D and muscle actin are coinjected into the cell. It is concluded that actins from plant and animal sources behave differently in vitro and in vivo and that they are functionally not interchangeable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?