In vitro expression of gelatinases in reconstructed melanoma model composited MV3 cells.

Yu Lü,Wei Zhang,Hong-guang Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130845
IF: 6.133
2013-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:To the editor: It has been known that invasion and metastasis of skin melanoma in situ is a complex multi-step process involving in the interaction between melanoma cells and the adjacent stromal cells and basement membrane (BM).1 Over the years, the process of melanoma invasion from epidermis to dermis was observed using animal models or human cutaneous melanoma lesions removed.2,3 As for the deleted human pathological specimens, it is difficult to completely restore invasion system in vitro. However, experimental animal is subjected to a damage or death in animal testing. Behind the animal in vivo, it contains various indefinite factors to influence tumor-cell invasion and migration. With the general enhance on awareness of animal protection, organized and realistic artificial tumor model is an acceptable alternative to animal melanoma research in this field, which is an important progress in observing skin melanoma invasion. Recently in vitro reconstructed melanoma models made by different melanoma cell lines cultured on dermal substitute e.g. collagen matrices were reported to study melanoma invasion.1 For instance, Eves et al4 reported that melanoma cells with invasive growth on acellular dermis expressed gelatinases (MMP-2, MMP-9). However, both invasive behavior of melanoma cells and those proteases activity correlated with the invasion seem wide variations in different melanoma cell lines.4 Hence, more experiments on invasion assay in those models would be required in this field. Our reconstructed human skin melanoma models with high fidelity consisted of human melanoma cell line MV3 originated from lymph node metastasis tissue and human de-epidermized acellular dermis (DED).5 We used immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods to detect expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the model, in order to observe invasion characteristics of MV3 melanoma cells. The expression of MMP-2 (Figure 1A, 1B, 1E), in correspondence with other melanoma cell lines with different metastatic behavior in vivo and in vitro, was positive in this model.4Figure 1.: Analysis of MMP-2, MMP-9 expression in the experimental model. Immunohistochemical staining: In this model MMP-2 (A, original magnification ×100) and MMP-9 (C, original magnification ×200) were expressed on the surface of basement membrane of DED. In the cavity of skin appendages of DED the expression of MMP-2 (B, original magnification ×200) and MMP-9 (D, original magnification ×400) were also positive in this model. E: Lengths of the PCR products (bp) are indicated. Each set of PCR amplification contained GADPH as internal control. Lanes 1, 7 are negative control. Lanes 2, 8 are GAPDH. MMP-2, MMP-9 were positive in the melanoma model (Lanes 3-6), on the contrary, their detections were negative in the DED without MV3 cells (Lanes 9-12). M: standard reference material.However, conflicting data have been reported on the expression of MMP-9 for different phases of melanoma. While it was found that MMP-9 was expressed by cell lines derived from advanced melanomas, and was absent in cell lines from early stage primary lesions.1 It was observed that MMP-9 was detected only in the radial growth phase of primary melanoma and absent in melanoma metastases.2 Hofmann et al3 demonstrated that MMP-9 was not detectable in MV3 cells and in rat xenografts models composited MV3 cells. They speculated that MMP-9 may not be expressed by tumor cells but predominantly by tumor surrounding stromal cells. We observed that MMP-9 was detected in our melanoma model (Figure 1C, 1D, 1E). In the prepared human DED, processed with 10 cycles of freezing and thawing, all living cells were destroyed and BM components (e.g. collagen IV) were retained.5 So, it can be explained by this mode that the MV3 cells can secrete MMP-2 and MMP-9 degrading collagen IV, the major constituent of BM, when neoplastic cells interacted with BM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?