Historical Trends in Social Mobility: Data, Methods, and Farming
Yu Xie,Alexandra Killewald
2010-01-01
Abstract:Using historical census data and survey data, Ferrie and Long (forthcoming) found a significant decline in social mobility in the United States from 1880 to 1973. We present three critiques of the Ferrie-Long study. First, the data quality of the Ferrie-Long study is far more limiting than the authors acknowledge, and we are able to detect some bias in their data in favor of their conclusion. Second, the Ferrie-Long study capitalizes on a particular method that is highly sensitive to an operationalization of the concept “social mobility.” Third, almost all the findings of the Ferrie-Long study are driven by farmers. Historical Trends in Social Mobility: Data, Methods, and Farming 3 INTRODUCTION Social scientists in general, and sociologists in particular, have long been interested in intergenerational occupational mobility. Indeed, the interest is so common in sociology that intergenerational occupational mobility is referred to there simply as “social mobility.” Most notable among innumerable contributions to the large literature on social mobility are landmark studies of Blau and Duncan (1967) and Featherman and Hauser (1978) for the U.S. and of Erikson and Goldthorpe (1992) for Europe. In these studies, social mobility is taken to measure a society’s openness. A widely accepted view rooted in neoclassical liberalism is that more social mobility, i.e., more openness, is good for a society, as it encourages placement of individuals in social positions according to competence rather than social origin (Hout 1988). Adding to this large literature on social mobility is now a well-researched study by economists Ferrie and Long (forthcoming). Using historical census data and survey data, the Ferrie-Long study compares the U.S. and Britain around 1880 and around 1973. A key finding of the study is that the United States was much more socially mobile than Britain in the period around 1880, but the two countries had similar levels of social mobility around 1973. The authors supplemented the core comparison of the four (2x2) datasets with the analysis of four additional datasets for the U.S., demonstrating a sharp decline in social mobility in the U.S. over its history of rapid industrialization and economic expansion from the post-Civil War era to the post-World War II era. Thus, the Ferrie-Long study supports the popular conception of America as an exceptional land of opportunity for all, but only prior to 1900. The findings of the Ferrie-Long study are bound to shock the community of scholars who have been studying social mobility. Beginning with Lipset and Bendix (1964) if not earlier, the sociological literature on comparative social mobility now dates back more than fifty years (Ganzeboom, Treiman, Ultee 1991). The dominant view in the literature is that relative social mobility, or social fluidity (to be defined below), is either constant, or trendless and patternless in all industrialized nations (Featherman, Jones, and Hauser 1975; Erikson and Goldthorpe 1992; Guest, Landale and McCann 1989; Grusky and Hauser 1984; Hauser et al. 1975). A main challenge to this dominant view, based on empirical studies, is that social mobility in industrialized nations has increased over time, albeit slowly (e.g., Breen and Jonsson 2007; Featherman and Hauser 1978; Grusky1986; Hout 1988; Vallet 2001). To our knowledge, Ferrie and Long are the first scholars to argue for the significant decline of social mobility in a major modern society. Given this controversial conclusion, whether or not the evidence actually supports their argument is of great interest to the larger scholarly community. Historical Trends in Social Mobility: Data, Methods, and Farming 4 Why are the key findings of the Ferrie-Long study so different from those in a long and well-established standard literature on comparative social mobility? While most scholars who study social mobility are sociologists with a widely-accepted but confined paradigm, Ferrie and Long are economists who use methods and data that have not been widely used in sociology. Thus, the Ferrie-Long study is valuable in providing both new data on historical social mobility in the U.S. and Britain and a new challenge to the dominant “trendless” view found in the sociology literature on comparative mobility. However, before we can accept the findings of the Ferrie-Long study, we need to fully understand the study and its limitations and explore alternative interpretations. In this paper, we present our critique of the Ferrie-Long study. While the Ferrie-Long study yielded many results, its most surprising finding was that the pre-1900 U.S. was much more socially mobile than the post-1970 U.S. Our critique thus focuses on the long-term trend analysis in the study of the U.S. case. Our critique can be summarized by three main points. First, the data quality of the Ferrie-Long study is far more limiting than the authors acknowledge, and we are able to detect some bias in their data in favor of their conclusion. Second, the Ferrie-Long study capitalizes on a particular method that is highly sensitive to an operationalization of the concept “social mobility.” Third, almost all the findings of the Ferrie-Long study are driven by farmers, who have not only constituted a unique sector in the labor market but also experienced a tremendous decline in the U.S. labor force since 1880. HISTORICAL CENSUS DATA A major contribution of the Ferrie-Long study is its creative use of historical census data. For simplicity, we focus our discussion on the U.S. data, as these data give rise to the surprising finding we discussed earlier. The basic idea is to link individuals (white males) across different censuses by name, state of birth (and parents’ states of birth), and year of birth. The linkage procedure capitalizes on the fact that, while only (1 percent) samples of families are available from the 1850, 1860, and 1900 U.S. censuses (http://usa.ipums.org/), the complete enumerations of the 1880 U.S. census are available (http://www.nappdata.org/). Appendix 1 of the Ferrie and Long (forthcoming) paper provides detailed documentation for linkages between the 1850 census and the 1880 census for white males ages 25 and under in 1850. We assume that the experience documented for 1850-1880 linkages is also applicable to those for 1860-1880 and 1880-1900 linkages that were also performed by the authors. Historical Trends in Social Mobility: Data, Methods, and Farming 5 The authors acknowledge certain limitations of the data resulting from this linking procedure, documenting a 22 percent success rate for “white males age 25 and under in 1850” (Ferrie and Long forthcoming, p.37). Our evaluation of the data quality proceeds in two steps. First, we document a data quality issue that is ignored in the Ferrie-Long study and its potential consequence for biases. Second, we provide some concrete evidence that suggests a bias resulting from their linking procedure in favor of Ferrie and Long’s conclusion. However, the question still lingers as to whether the matched data are of sufficient quality, especially given a high failure rate of 78 percent. If the occurrence of matching failures were truly random, as the authors assume, the low success rate would have not caused any bias to the results. In the other extreme scenario of strong sample selection, however, the sample of successfully matched cases would have provided little identifying information about the general population to which the authors wish to generalize (Manski 1995). Thus, it is extremely important that we evaluate the quality of the matched data from historical censuses. One data issue that is not discussed by Ferrie and Long in their paper is the requirement of coresidence with fathers on the earlier census. For example, in order to construct the intergenerational mobility table by matching data from the 1850 and 1880 U.S. censuses, it is necessary that boys ages 13-19 be reported to co-reside with their fathers on the 1850 census form, as we also need the father-son linkage on the 1850 census form to know father’s occupation (in 1850). Not all young white males lived with their fathers. Using data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) (Ruggles et al. 2009), we examine the residential status of boys of the ages considered in the Ferrie and Long study. In our reanalysis of the 1850 data, we find the percentage of coresidence to be 72% for white males ages 0-25 and 68% for white males ages 13-19. As expected, the coresidence rate differs by age, farm status, and student status. We provide full descriptive statistics involving these variables in Table 1. 1 We are unclear as to why the documentation refers to white males ages 25 and under in 1850, as the authors actually used data for white males between ages 13 and 19 in their main mobility analysis reported in the paper. In our reanalysis of the data, we do not find the matching rate to differ much as we change the age range from 0-25 to 13-19. 2 Our reanalysis of the Ferrie-Long data focuses on linkages between the 1850 and 1880 censuses because this is the matched data that were provided to us by Joseph Ferrie. Appendix 1 of the Ferrie and Long paper also discusses the 1850-1880 linkages extensively. Historical Trends in Social Mobility: Data, Methods, and Farming 6 Table 1: Estimated Statistics for Young White Males in 1850 U.S. Farm Non-Farm In School Not in School 0-25 54.8 32.5 72.7 80.4 63.5 85.9 66.4 13-19 58.1 43.9 68.6 78.1 55.3 81.3 58.6 13 60.7 66.5 80.7 87.0 71.0 83.8 74.5 14 58.3 62.1 77.5 84.2 68.1 81.5 71.0 15 60.4 54.8 75.3 82.4 64.4 82.1 67.0 16 58.9 43.9 70.5 79.4 57.6 81.3 62.0 17 58.2 34.5 64.6 75.0 50.0 79.3 56.8 18 55.1 23.8 57.5 70.1 42.0 79.1 50.7 19 54.8 18.1 51.7 65.6 34.8 75.8 46.3 Source: IPUMS of the 1850 US Census % On Farm % In School Age % Living with Father Total by Farm Status by Student Status The first two columns of Table 1 show that, in 1850, 58% of U.S