Clinicogenomic characterization of inflammatory breast cancer
Nolan Priedigkeit,Beth Harrison,Robert Shue,Melissa E. Hughes,Yvonne Li,Gregory J. Kirkner,Liam F. Spurr,Marie Claire Remolano,Sarah Strauss,Janet Files,Anne-Marie Feeney,Libby Grant,Ayesha Mohammed-Abreu,Ana Garrido-Castro,Romualdo Barroso Sousa,Brittany Bychkovsky,Faina Nakhlis,Jennifer R. Bellon,Tari A. King,Eric P. Winer,Neal Lindeman,Bruce E. Johnson,Lynette Sholl,Deborah Dillon,Beth Overmoyer,Sara M. Tolaney,Andrew Cherniack,Nancy U. Lin,Filipa Lynce
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.07.592972
2024-05-10
Abstract:Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and poorly characterized type of breast cancer with an aggressive clinical presentation. The biological mechanisms driving the IBC phenotype are relatively undefined, partially due to a lack of comprehensive, large-scale genomic studies and limited clinical cohorts.
Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2457 patients with metastatic breast cancer who underwent targeted tumor-only DNA-sequencing was performed at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Clinicopathologic, single nucleotide variant (SNV), copy number variant (CNV) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) comparisons were made between clinically confirmed IBC cases within a dedicated IBC center versus non-IBC cases.
Results: Clinicopathologic differences between IBC and non-IBC cases were consistent with prior reports, including IBC being associated with younger age at diagnosis, higher grade, and enrichment with hormone receptor (HR)-negative and HER2-positive tumors. The most frequent somatic alterations in IBC involved TP53 (72%), ERBB2 (32%), PIK3CA (24%), CCND1 (12%), MYC (9%), FGFR1 (8%) and GATA3 (8%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant enrichment in TP53 SNVs in IBC; particularly in HER2-positive and HR-positive disease which was associated with worse outcomes. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not differ substantially between IBC and non-IBC cases and a pathway analysis revealed an enrichment in NOTCH pathway alterations in HER2-positive disease.
Conclusion: Taken together, this study provides a comprehensive, clinically informed landscape of somatic alterations in a large cohort of patients with IBC. Our data support higher frequency of TP53 mutations and a potential enrichment in NOTCH pathway activation, but overall; a lack of major genomic differences. These results both reinforce the importance of TP53 alterations in IBC pathogenesis as well as their influence on clinical outcomes; but also suggest additional analyses beyond somatic DNA-level changes are warranted.
Genomics