Safety and Efficacy of Sorafenib for the Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation

Abhijeet Waghray,Bengi Balci,Galal El-Gazzaz,Charles M. Miller,Robert J. Pelley,Federico N. Aucejo,K. V. Narayanan Menon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12150
2013-01-01
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:Introduction Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver transplantation (LT) carries a poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in patients with recurrent HCC following LT.Methods A prospectively maintained LT database was retrospectively analyzed for patients with recurrent HCC following LT between 2001 and 2011-34 patients. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they were prescribed sorafenib (n=17) or not prescribed sorafenib (n=17). The primary endpoint was overall survival.Results There were no significant differences between the two groups analyzed. Seventeen patients were on sorafenib for recurrent HCC, with a mean daily dose of similar to 444mg. Mean duration of treatment was similar to 10months. Side effects included: thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, rising transaminases, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, and nausea. Survival in the sorafenib vs. non-sorafenib group was greater at three-, six-, nine-, and 12-month intervals and overall survival.Conclusion Sorafenib can be well tolerated and safe in patients with recurrent HCC following LT and may be associated with a modest survival benefit. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center retrospective analysis of patients prescribed sorafenib for recurrent HCC after LT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?