Innovative Financing of Health Care

Tatum Anderson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4235

2009-01-01

BMJ

Abstract:With national budgets stretched, countries are trying to find new ways to fund aid to developing countries, Tatum Anderson reports

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

[Evolution and new perspectives of health care financing in developing countries]

Martine Audibert,Jacky Mathonnat,Eric de Roodenbeke

Abstract:Over the last twenty five years, the perspective of health care financing has dramatically changed in developing countries. In this context, it is worth reviewing the literature and the experiences in order to understand the major shifts on this topic. During the sixties, health care policies focused on fighting major epidemics. Programs were dedicated to reduce the threat to population health. Financing related to the mobilization of resources for these programs and most of them were not managed within national administrations. The success of these policies was not sustainable. After Alma Ata, primary health care became a priority but it took some years before the management of the health care district was introduced as a major topic. In the eighties, with the district policy and the Bamako Initiative, the economic approach became a major part of all health care policies. At that time, most of health care financing was related to cost recovery strategies. All the attention was then drawn on how it worked: Fee policies, distribution of revenues, efficient use of resources and so on. In the second half of the nineties, cost recovery was relegated to the back scene, health care financing policy then becoming a major front scene matter. Two major reasons may explain this change in perspective: HIV which causes a major burden on the whole health system, and fighting poverty in relation with debts reduction. In most developing countries, with high HIV prevalence, access to care is no longer possible within the framework of the ongoing heath care financing scheme. Health plays a major role in poverty reduction strategies but health care officials must take into account every aspect of public financing. New facts also have to be taken into account: Decentralization/autonomy policies, the growing role of third party payment and the rising number of qualified health care professionals. All these facts, along with a broader emphasis given to the market, introduce a need for a better management of resources through financing mechanisms. Some major reports from WHO and the World Bank are the landmarks of the evolution on how to approach health care financing: The 1993 World Bank report on investing in health, the 2000 WHO report on health in the world and the WHO report on macroeconomics and health. In this early millenium, there is a general agreement on some major aspects of health care financing such as: Lack of resources for financing health care; cost recovery as a part of any sustainable health care system; health as a public good needing some extended subsidies; protecting people from the burden of disease as a part of financing schemes; equity in relation with the public private mix at the center of many debates; financing as a key mechanism for the regulation of the whole health care system and not only as a resource mobilization; HIV in bringing up new problems clearly shows how all these matters are related. Health care financing is at the heart of ongoing questions on health care reforms. Although developing countries have low insurance coverage and weak modern medical care, they share the same questions as developed countries: How to promote technical and allocative efficiency? What place for incentives? What role for the public sector? How can market and contracting bring results? What progress through stewardship and better governance?
The financing gaps framework: using need, potential spending and expected spending to allocate development assistance for health

Annie Haakenstad,Tara Templin,Stephen Lim,Jesse B Bump,Joseph Dieleman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx165

2018-02-01

Abstract:As growth in development assistance for health levels off, development assistance partners must make allocation decisions within tighter budget constraints. Furthermore, with the advent of comprehensive and comparable burden of disease and health financing estimates, empirical evidence can increasingly be used to direct funding to those most in need. In our 'financing gaps framework', we propose a new approach for harnessing information to make decisions about health aid. The framework was designed to be forward-looking, goal-oriented, versatile and customizable to a range of organizational contexts and health aims. Our framework brings together expected health spending, potential health spending and spending need, to orient financing decisions around international health targets. As an example of how the framework could be applied, we develop a case study, focused on global goals for child health. The case study harnesses data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study, Financing Global Health 2015, the WHO Global Health Observatory and National Health Accounts. Funding flows are tied to progress toward the Sustainable Development Goal's target for reductions in under-five mortality. The flexibility and comprehensiveness of our framework makes it adaptable for use by a diverse set of governments, donors, policymakers and other stakeholders. The framework can be adapted to short- or long-run time frames, cross-country or subnational scales, and to a number of specific health focus areas. Depending on donor preferences, the framework can be deployed to incentivize local investments in health, ensuring the long-term sustainability of health systems in low- and middle-income countries, while also furnishing international support for progress toward global health goals.
Sustainability of specialized healthcare in upper-middle-income economies: Innovations despite constraints

Amza Ali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2717

2024-08-19

Abstract:Countries such as Jamaica have had to be largely self-reliant in funding their health-care systems. The success of an early and sustained focus on primary healthcare, coupled with a change in the disease profile from infectious concerns to chronic non-communicable diseases associated with aging, has resulted in a marked rise in healthcare costs. Rapid technological advances in the diagnosis and treatment of many specialized conditions have further increased the cost of care. Funding these health-care costs sustainably is a challenge for Jamaica and other similarly developed economies due to competing demands for scarce funds. In addition to government health-care allocations, sources of sustainable funding from local public-private partnerships, through mechanisms such as philanthropy, may help address, at least in part, this chronic problem. This review examines strategies to create a framework for such funding, as well as proposes specific practical steps for their achievement. The author’s motivation to participate in the process of change stems from the stubbornly persistent inequalities of healthcare that people and health-care workers in Jamaica – and similar lower- and middle-income countries – routinely cope with. These inequalities must be addressed to truly achieve greater health egalitarianism, social stability, and ultimately, the developed country status they aspire to. The need to think innovatively to achieve this goal is self-evident, given the current inability of governments to achieve this goal.
Innovative financing for HIV response in sub-Saharan Africa

Rifat Atun,Sachin Silva,Mthuli Ncube,Anna Vassall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.010407

Abstract:Background: In 2015 around 15 million people living with HIV were receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustained provision of ART, though both prudent and necessary, creates substantial long-term fiscal obligations for countries affected by HIV/AIDS. As donor assistance for health remains constrained, novel financing mechanisms are needed to augment funding domestic sources. We explore how Innovative Financing has been used to co-finance domestic HIV/AIDS responses. Based on analysis of non-health sectors, we identify innovative financing instruments that could be used in the HIV response. Methods: We undertook a systematic review to identify innovative financing instruments used for (1) domestic HIV/AIDS financing in sub-Saharan Africa (2) international health financing and (3) financing in non-health sectors. We analyzed peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2002 and 2014. We examined the nature and volume of funds mobilized with innovative financing, then in consultation with leading experts, identified instruments that held potential for financing the HIV response. Results: Our analysis revealed three innovative financing instruments in use: Zimbabwe's AIDS Trust Fund (a tax/levy-based instrument), Botswana's National HIV/AIDS Prevention Support (BNAPS) International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) Buy-Down (a debt conversion instrument), and Côte d'Ivoire's Debt2Health Debt Swap Agreement (a debt conversion instrument). Zimbabwe's AIDS Trust Fund generated US$ 52.7 million between 2008 and 2011, Botswana's IBRD Buy-Down generated US$ 20 million, and Côte d'Ivoire's Debt2Health Debt Swap Agreement generated US$ 27 million, at least half of which was to be invested in HIV/AIDS programs. Four additional categories of innovative financing instruments met our criteria for future use: (1) remittances and diaspora bonds (2) social and development impact bonds (3) sovereign wealth funds (4) risk and credit guarantees. Conclusion: A limited number of innovative financing instruments contributed a very modest share of funding toward domestic HIV/AIDS programs. Several innovative financing instruments successfully applied in other sectors could be used to augment domestic financing toward HIV/AIDS programmes.
Emerging Lessons from the Development of National Health Financing Strategies in Eight Developing Countries

Jonathan Cali,Marty Makinen,Yann Derriennic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2018.1438058

2018-02-09

Abstract:Abstract—As countries advance economically, they are increasingly under pressure to mobilize and properly manage domestic resources to provide affordable health care for their citizens. The World Health Organization and international donors have encouraged countries to develop a health financing strategy (HFS) to plan how to best achieve these objectives. This article highlights lessons and considerations for countries developing HFSs and for donors supporting the process, in the areas of data use, cross-country learning, evaluation, leadership involvement, and stakeholder management. This article's review of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)-supported Health Finance and Governance (HFG) and Health System Strengthening Plus projects' experiences assisting eight countries with HFS development concludes that the HFS development process generates demand among low- and middle-income country policy makers for health financing data and that countries that complete HFSs accept that basing a strategy on imperfect data is better than not having a strategy. The article also concludes that cross-country learning, through guided study trips and reviews of other health systems and HFS processes, is paramount for developing an HFS and that most countries have not included monitoring and evaluation plans in their HFSs. Finally, in HFG's experience, countries developing HFSs have been successful in fostering ownership among a broad coalition of stakeholders but diverge in their approaches to involving political leaders in detailed technical debates about health financing reform. These lessons and challenges, based on real-world experiences, can help low- and middle-income countries to develop politically feasible HFSs that promote financial sustainability of the health sector, protect people from burdensome health care costs, improve efficiency, and advance universal health coverage.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Innovative domestic financing mechanisms for health in Africa: An evidence review

Nouria Brikci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196231181081

Abstract:Objectives: This article synthesizes the evidence on what have been called innovative domestic financing mechanisms for health (i.e. any domestic revenue-raising mechanism allowing governments to diversify away from traditional approaches such as general taxation, value-added tax, user fees or any type of health insurance) aimed at increasing fiscal space for health in African countries. The article seeks to answer the following questions: What types of domestic innovative financial mechanisms have been used to finance health care across Africa? How much additional revenue have these innovative financing mechanisms raised? Has the revenue raised through these mechanisms been, or was it meant to be, earmarked for health? What is known about the policy process associated with their design and implementation? Methods: A systematic review of the published and grey literature was conducted. The review focused on identifying articles providing quantitative information about the additional financial resources generated through innovative domestic financing mechanisms for health care in Africa, and/or qualitative information about the policy process associated with the design or effective implementation of these financing mechanisms. Results: The search led to an initial list of 4035 articles. Ultimately, 15 studies were selected for narrative analysis. A wide range of study methods were identified, from literature reviews to qualitative and quantitative analysis and case studies. The financing mechanisms implemented or planned for were varied, the most common being taxes on mobile phones, alcohol and money transfers. Few articles documented the revenue that could be raised through these mechanisms. For those that did, the revenue projected to be raised was relatively low, ranging from 0.01% of GDP for alcohol tax alone to 0.49% of GDP if multiple levies were applied. In any case, virtually none of the mechanisms have apparently been implemented. The articles revealed that, prior to implementation, the political acceptability, the readiness of institutions to adapt to the proposed reform and the potential distortionary impact these reforms may have on the targeted industry all require careful consideration. From a design perspective, the fundamental question of earmarking proved complex both politically and administratively, with very few mechanisms actually earmarked, thus questioning whether they could effectively fill part of the health-financing gap. Finally, ensuring that these mechanisms supported the underlying equity objectives of universal health coverage was recognized as important. Conclusions: Additional research is needed to understand better the potential of innovative domestic revenue generating mechanisms to fill the financing gap for health in Africa and diversify away from more traditional financing approaches. Whilst their revenue potential in absolute terms seems limited, they could represent an avenue for broader tax reforms in support of health. This will require sustained dialogue between Ministries of Health and Ministries of Finance.
The nature and contribution of innovative health financing mechanisms in the World Health Organization African region: A scoping review

Juliet Nabyonga-Orem,Christmal D Christmals,Kingsley F Addai,Kasonde Mwinga,Diane Karenzi-Muhongerwa,Sylvia Namuli,James A Asamani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04153

2023-11-15

Abstract:Background: Achieving financial risk protection for the whole population requires significant financing for health. Health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are plagued with persistent underfunding, and recent reductions in official development assistance have been registered. To create fiscal space for health, the pursuit of efficiency gains and exploring innovative health financing for health seem attractive. This paper sought to synthesize available evidence on the nature of innovative health financing instruments, mechanisms and policies implemented in Africa. We further reviewed the factors that hinder or facilitate implementation, the lessons learnt on the structure, the development process and the implementation. Methods: We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature to analyze the nature, type, and factors impacting the implementation of innovative health financing mechanisms in the World Health Organization (WHO) African region. Results: Innovative health financing mechanisms are increasing in the WHO African region as a result of international policy, the need to improve healthy eating and social life of the populace, advocacy and the availability of international mechanisms to which countries can subscribe. The 41 documents included in this review reported ten innovative financing mechanisms in 43 out of the 47 WHO Africa region member states. The most common mechanisms include an excise tax on tobacco products (43 countries) and alcoholic beverages and spirits (41 countries), airline ticket levy (18 countries), sugar-based beverages tax (seven countries), and levy on oil, gas and mineral tax (four countries). Other mechanisms include the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) trust fund, the social impact bond, the financial transaction tax, mobile phone tax and equity funds. Funds generated from many mechanisms are not allocated to health, although some portions are allocated to health-related activities. In some countries where mechanisms implemented are public health-related, emphasis is placed on positive health behavior beyond raising funds. Persistent resistance from industries due to conflicting economic policies is a major challenge. Conclusions: Leveraging international policies and setting up intersectoral committees to develop and implement innovative mechanisms that involve excise taxes are recommended as possible solutions to the conflicts of interest.
Performance-based Financing versus “Unconditional” Direct Facility Financing - False Dichotomy?

Sophie Witter,Maria Paola Bertone,Karin Diaconu,Olga Bornemisza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2021.2006121

2021-01-01

Abstract:A debate about how best to finance essential health care in low- and middle-income settings has been running for decades, with public health systems often failing to provide reliable and adequate funding for primary health care in particular. Since 2000, many have advocated and experimented with performance-based financing as one approach to addressing this problem. More recently, in light of concerns over high transaction costs, mixed results and challenges of sustainability, a less conditional approach, sometimes called direct facility financing, has come into favor. In this commentary, we examine the evidence for the effectiveness of both modalities and argue that they share many features and requirements for effectiveness. In the right context, both can contribute to health system strengthening, and they should be seen as potentially complementary, rather than as rivals.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Universal health coverage in India: Newer innovations and the role of public health

Suneela Garg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.IJPH_221_18

Abstract:The realization of Universal Health Coverage requires adequate healthcare financing and human resources to provide financial protection to the economically disadvantaged population by covering their medicine, diagnostics, and service costs. Conventionally, inadequate public healthcare financing and the lack of skilled human resources are considered as the major barriers towards achieving UHC in India. To strengthen the Indian healthcare system, there has been significant increase budgetary allocation towards healthcare, a national health protection scheme targeting low-income households, upgrading of primary health-care and expansion of the health work-force. Nevertheless, an evolving paradigm for improving holistic health, sanitation, nutrition, gender equity, drug accessibility and affordability, innovative initiatives in national health programs for reduction of maternal deaths, tuberculosis and HIV burden and the utilization of information technology in healthcare provision of the underserved and the marginalized is gaining rapid acceleration. These represent a genuine innovation towards fulfillment of UHC goals for India.
Bridging the gap: financing health promotion and disease prevention in Indonesia

Ahmad Fuady,Mariska Anindhita,Matsna Haniifah,Abdillah Ahsan,Agus Sugiharto,Marinda Asiah Nuril Haya,Trevino Pakasi,Dian Kusuma,Dewi Amila Solikha,Pungkas Bahjuri Ali and Indah Suci Widyahening

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01206-7

2024-10-17

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:Spending on preventive care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Indonesia, is much lower than spending on curative care. There has been a pressing need to develop a clear pathway to increase spending on preventive care. This study aimed to assess the current financing landscape for health promotion and disease prevention in Indonesia and, subsequently, to develop a framework and recommendations for future health promotion financing in the country.

health policy & services
FINANCING MODELS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVES: LESSONS FROM MATERNAL AND GENDER EQUALITY PROGRAMS

Kevin Namiiro Kuteesa,Chidiogo Uzoamaka Akpuokwe,Chioma Ann Udeh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i4.1050

2024-04-20

International Medical Science Research Journal

Abstract:Financing models play a pivotal role in sustaining and advancing global health initiatives, particularly those aimed at addressing maternal health and promoting gender equality. This review provides a comprehensive overview of financing strategies employed in such initiatives, drawing insights from successful programs and highlighting key lessons learned. Maternal health remains a critical area of concern worldwide, with millions of women facing risks during pregnancy and childbirth. Gender disparities exacerbate these challenges, further underscoring the importance of targeted interventions. Financing models for maternal health initiatives have evolved over the years, with a shift towards innovative approaches that prioritize sustainability and scalability. One prominent financing model is the use of public-private partnerships (PPPs), which leverage resources from both governmental and non-governmental entities. These partnerships facilitate greater efficiency in resource allocation and enable the mobilization of additional funding streams. Examples such as the Global Financing Facility (GFF) demonstrate how PPPs have catalyzed investments in maternal health, leading to tangible improvements in access to quality care. Furthermore, results-based financing (RBF) mechanisms have gained traction in incentivizing the achievement of specific health outcomes. Through performance-based incentives, RBF encourages healthcare providers to deliver high-quality services while ensuring accountability and transparency. Initiatives like the World Bank's RBF programs have shown promising results in enhancing maternal health outcomes and narrowing gender gaps in access to healthcare. Additionally, innovative financing mechanisms such as social impact bonds (SIBs) and development impact bonds (DIBs) offer new avenues for mobilizing private capital towards maternal and gender equality programs. By aligning financial returns with social impact goals, these instruments attract investors seeking both financial and social returns, thereby diversifying funding sources and promoting sustainability. Financing models for global health initiatives targeting maternal and gender equality programs are diverse and dynamic, reflecting the multifaceted nature of these challenges. Lessons learned from successful initiatives underscore the importance of collaboration, innovation, and adaptability in achieving sustainable progress towards maternal health and gender equality goals on a global scale. Keywords: Finance, Models, Global Health, Maternal, Gender Equity, Review.
Advocacy, experience sharing and action planning toward raising additional financing for primary health care: spending more and spending better towards universal health coverage

Diana Kizza,Juliet Nabyonga-Orem,Brendan Kwesiga,Maria Muniz,Ogochukwu Chukwujekwu,Paul Ngwakum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-024-00290-5

2024-05-23

Abstract:Background: Reallocation of funding to respond the covid-19 pandemic, against a backdrop of longstanding underfunded health systems and high out of pocket expenditures for health, affected access to health services for households, especially those without social protection. These highlighted the urgency in curbing the impact of disruptions on progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) goals. Strategic investments in Primary Health Care (PHC) can help spur the necessary momentum. Methods: Under the collaborative platform of the Harmonization for Health in Africa's Health Financing Technical Working Group; UNICEF Regional Office for East and Southern Africa and WHO Regional Office for Africa convened the first PHC financing forum for 21 countries across the Eastern and Southern Africa Region. The three-day forum engaged key health and financing decision makers in constructive dialogue to identify practical actions and policy changes needed to accelerate delivery of UHC through improvements in PHC financing mechanisms and arrangements. The forum was attended by over 130 senior policy makers and technicians from governments, United Nations agencies and nonstate actors drawn from within country, regional and affiliating headquarter institutions. Results: The Regional Forum engaged participants in meaningful, and constructive discussions. Five themes emerged (1) regular measurement and monitoring of PHC services and spending (2) increasing investments in PHC (3) enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, and equity of PHC spending, (4) ensuring an enabling environment to invest more and better in PHC, and (5) better partnerships for the realization of commitments. An outcome statement summarizing the main recommendations of the meeting was approved at the end of the forum, and action plans were developed by 14 government delegations to improve PHC financing within country-specific context and priorities. Conclusions and recommendations: The aims of this meeting in augmenting the political will created through the Africa Leadership Meeting (ALM), by catalyzing technical direction for increased momentum for improved health financing across all African countries was achieved. Peer exchanges offered practical approaches countries can take to improve health financing in ways that are suited to regional context providing a channel for incremental improvements to health outcomes in the countries.
Rethinking how development assistance for health can catalyse progress on primary health care

Tobias Kasper,Gavin Yamey,Sinead Dwyer,Kaci Kennedy McDade,Jon Lidén,Cora Lüdemann,Mohamed Mustafa Diab,Osondu Ogbuoji,Prashant Poodla,Christina Schrade,Andrea Thoumi,Armand Zimmerman,Yibeltal Assefa,Luke N Allen,Paulin Basinga,Patricia J Garcia,Debra Jackson,Henry Mwanyika,Rachel Nugent,Anthony Ofosu,Salman Rawaf,K Srinath Reddy,Dykki Settle,Beth Tritter,Christoph Benn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01813-5

2023-12-09

Abstract:Global campaigns to control HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, and vaccine-preventable illnesses showed that large-scale impact can be achieved by using additional international financing to support selected, evidence-based, high-impact investment areas and to catalyse domestic resource mobilisation. Building on this paradigm, we make the case for targeting additional international funding for selected high-impact investments in primary health care. We have identified and costed a set of concrete, evidence-based investments that donors could support, which would be expected to have major impacts at an affordable cost. These investments are in: (1) individuals and communities empowered to engage in health decision making, (2) a new model of people-centred primary care, and (3) next generation community health workers. These three areas would be supported by strengthening two cross-cutting elements of national systems. The first is the digital tools and data that support facility, district, and national managers to improve processes, quality of care, and accountability across primary health care. The second is the educational, training, and supervisory systems needed to improve the quality of care. We estimate that with an additional international investment of between US$1·87 billion in a low-investment scenario and $3·85 billion in a high-investment scenario annually over the next 3 years, the international community could support the scale-up of this evidence-based package of investments in the 59 low-income and middle-income countries that are eligible for external financing from the World Bank Group's International Development Association.
Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries

Joseph Dieleman, Madeline Campbell, Abigail Chapin, Erika Eldrenkamp, Victoria Y Fan, Annie Haakenstad, Jennifer Kates, Yingying Liu, Taylor Matyasz, Angela Micah, Alex Reynolds, Nafis Sadat, Matthew T Schneider, Reed Sorensen, Tim Evans, David Evans, Christoph Kurowski, Ajay Tandon, Kaja M Abbas, Semaw Ferede Abera, Aliasghar Ahmad Kiadaliri, Kedir Yimam Ahmed, Muktar Beshir Ahmed, Khurshid Alam, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei, Ala'a Alkerwi, Erfan Amini, Walid Ammar, Stephen Marc Amrock, Carl Abelardo T Antonio, Tesfay Mehari Atey, Leticia Avila-Burgos, Ashish Awasthi, Aleksandra Barac, Oscar Alberto Bernal, Addisu Shunu Beyene, Tariku Jibat Beyene, Charles Birungi, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Nicholas J K Breitborde, Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado, Ruben Estanislao Castro, Ferran Catalia-Lopez, Koustuv Dalal, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Pieter de Jager, Samath D Dharmaratne, Manisha Dubey, Carla Sofia e Sa Farinha, Andre Faro, Andrea B Feigl, Florian Fischer, Joseph Robert Anderson Fitchett

2017-05-20

Abstract:Background An adequate amount of prepaid resources for health is important to ensure access to health services and for the pursuit of universal health coverage. Previous studies on global health financing have described the relationship between economic development and health financing. In this study, we further explore global health financing trends and examine how the sources of funds used, types of services purchased, and development assistance for health disbursed change with economic development. We also identify countries that deviate from the trends. Methods We estimated national health spending by type of care and by source, including development assistance for health, based on a diverse set of data including programme reports, budget data, national estimates, and 964 National Health Accounts. These data represent health spending for 184 countries from 1995 through 2014. We converted …
Consumer-led demand side financing in health and education and its relevance for low and middle income countries

Tim Ensor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.762

Abstract:There is increasing awareness that supply subsidies for health and education services often fail to benefit those that are most vulnerable in a community. This recognition has led to a growing interest in and experimentation with, consumer-led demand side financing systems (CL-DSF). These mechanisms place purchasing power in the hands of consumers to spend on specific services at accredited facilities. International evidence in education and health sectors suggest a limited success of CL-DSF in raising the consumption of key services amongst priority groups. There is also some evidence that vouchers can be used to improve targeting of vulnerable groups. There is very little positive evidence on the effect of CL-DSF on service quality as a consequence of greater competition. Location of services relative to population means that areas with more provider choice, particularly in the private sector, tend to be dominated by higher and middle-income households. Extending CL-DSF in low-income countries requires the development of capacity in administering these financing schemes and also accrediting providers. Schemes could focus primarily on fixed packages of key services aimed at easily identifiable groups. Piloting and robust evaluation is required to fill the evidence gap on the impact of these mechanisms. Extending demand financing to less predictable services, such as hospital coverage for the population, is likely to require the development of a voucher scheme to purchase insurance. This suggests an already developed insurance market and is unlikely to be appropriate in most low-income countries for some time.
Innovative health service delivery models in low and middle income countries - what can we learn from the private sector?

Onil Bhattacharyya,Sara Khor,Anita McGahan,David Dunne,Abdallah S Daar,Peter A Singer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-8-24

2010-07-15

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:BackgroundThe poor in low and middle income countries have limited access to health services due to limited purchasing power, residence in underserved areas, and inadequate health literacy. This produces significant gaps in health care delivery among a population that has a disproportionately large burden of disease. They frequently use the private health sector, due to perceived or actual gaps in public services. A subset of private health organizations, some called social enterprises, have developed novel approaches to increase the availability, affordability and quality of health care services to the poor through innovative health service delivery models. This study aims to characterize these models and identify areas of innovation that have led to effective provision of care for the poor.MethodsAn environmental scan of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to select exemplars of innovation. A case series of organizations was then purposively sampled to maximize variation. These cases were examined using content analysis and constant comparison to characterize their strategies, focusing on business processes.ResultsAfter an initial sample of 46 studies, 10 case studies of exemplars were developed spanning different geography, disease areas and health service delivery models. These ten organizations had innovations in their marketing, financing, and operating strategies. These included approaches such a social marketing, cross-subsidy, high-volume, low cost models, and process reengineering. They tended to have a narrow clinical focus, which facilitates standardizing processes of care, and experimentation with novel delivery models. Despite being well-known, information on the social impact of these organizations was variable, with more data on availability and affordability and less on quality of care.ConclusionsThese private sector organizations demonstrate a range of innovations in health service delivery that have the potential to better serve the poor's health needs and be replicated. There is a growing interest in investing in social enterprises, like the ones profiled here. However, more rigorous evaluations are needed to investigate the impact and quality of the health services provided and determine the effectiveness of particular strategies.

health policy & services
Banking for health: opportunities in cooperation between banking and health applying innovation from other sectors

Ilona Kickbusch,Rüdiger Krech,Christian Franz,Nadya Wells

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000598

2018-06-06

Abstract:The annual funding need for global health SDG targets is estimated by WHO at US$134 billion per year, rising to US$274-$371bn by 2030. This paper examines the challenge of making sustainable investment structures in global health more attractive for mainstream financial markets. The objective is a framework for targeted future debate with financial sector actors. Four case studies of innovative sustainable investment mechanisms are analysed, elaborating potential transfer of green and impact investment models in order to channel additional private sector funds to health. To increase private sector involvement, profit must accrue to providers of finance. The paper shows how health criteria can be incorporated into structures, which create triple bottom line return opportunities. Health infrastructure projects based on risk sharing models with governments or multilateral agencies could use long-term funding, with better credit ratings and lower cost of capital. Outcomes based investment, similar to green or social impact bonds, with third-party certification of measurable health impact, satisfy the private sector need for return with social interest objectives. Responsible investment could expand by adding a 'health' (H) criterion to the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) framework, implementing ESG+H for mainstream investment screening. These models are scalable, satisfy the need to dedicate funds to health and incorporate consistent critical success metrics. The conclusion finds that strong legal frameworks and exploration of fiscal incentives will be critical next steps to facilitate scaling up and broadening of interest from private sector financial actors. The impact these investments have on overall population health is a positive externality of sustainable global health investment.
Raising more domestic money for health: prospects for low- and middle-income countries

Riku Elovainio,David B. Evans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133116000426

2017-03-23

Abstract:Abstract Since the 2007/2008 financial crisis, the rhetoric in the development assistance dialogue has shifted away from raising more international funding for health, to requesting countries to move toward self-sufficiency. This paper examines the potential of 46 countries identified by an international panel in 2009 as being of high need to raise additional funding for health from domestic sources. Economic growth alone would allow 12 of them to reach a level of health spending where their populations could have access to a very basic set of health services. All of them have the potential to raise additional domestic funds through a range of measures that have been tried successfully in other low- and middle-income countries, but they would all remain well below the eventual objective of universal health coverage without increased and predictable external financial support.
Indonesia's healthcare landscape: embracing innovation in the new health regime

Ferry Fadzlul Rahman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2349732

2024-05-07

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract:The comment highlights the intricate health issues in Indonesia, emphasizing urban-rural gaps, healthcare financing challenges, and the government's dedication to Universal Health Coverage (UHC). The country's geographical layout amplifies the struggle of providing healthcare to rural areas, resulting in substantial health concerns like high tuberculosis rates and financial vulnerability for the impoverished. The concern raised underscores the paradox of low state healthcare spending despite high household expenditures, leading to individual payment reliance and underutilization of insurance. The analysis advocates a comprehensive healthcare approach, emphasizing prevention and curative actions. It also stresses the importance of decentralizing decision-making power to local governments for optimizing healthcare funds. The comment concludes by emphasizing the need for innovative solutions in Indonesia's healthcare landscape. It envisions a future where transformative approaches reshape the system, ensuring better health outcomes. Innovation, especially in medical technology, digital health, and healthcare delivery models, is identified as a central theme. The recommendation underscores the importance of creative solutions to address healthcare service limitations and advocates for leveraging advancements in preventive measures, education, and tackling lifestyle issues. The overall aim is to navigate Indonesia through its current healthcare challenges towards a more sustainable and effective system for the benefit of its population.

medicine, general & internal, research & experimental
Buying cures versus renting health: Financing health care with consumer loans

Vahid Montazerhodjat,David M. Weinstock,Andrew W. Lo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aad6913

IF: 17.1

2016-02-24

Science Translational Medicine

Abstract:Health care loans—the equivalent of mortgages for large health care expenses—are a practical way to increase patient access to costly transformative therapies.

cell biology,medicine, research & experimental

Innovative Financing of Health Care

[Evolution and new perspectives of health care financing in developing countries]

The financing gaps framework: using need, potential spending and expected spending to allocate development assistance for health

Sustainability of specialized healthcare in upper-middle-income economies: Innovations despite constraints

Innovative financing for HIV response in sub-Saharan Africa

Emerging Lessons from the Development of National Health Financing Strategies in Eight Developing Countries

Innovative domestic financing mechanisms for health in Africa: An evidence review

The nature and contribution of innovative health financing mechanisms in the World Health Organization African region: A scoping review

Performance-based Financing versus “Unconditional” Direct Facility Financing - False Dichotomy?

Universal health coverage in India: Newer innovations and the role of public health

Bridging the gap: financing health promotion and disease prevention in Indonesia

FINANCING MODELS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVES: LESSONS FROM MATERNAL AND GENDER EQUALITY PROGRAMS

Advocacy, experience sharing and action planning toward raising additional financing for primary health care: spending more and spending better towards universal health coverage

Rethinking how development assistance for health can catalyse progress on primary health care

Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries

Consumer-led demand side financing in health and education and its relevance for low and middle income countries

Innovative health service delivery models in low and middle income countries - what can we learn from the private sector?

Banking for health: opportunities in cooperation between banking and health applying innovation from other sectors

Raising more domestic money for health: prospects for low- and middle-income countries

Indonesia's healthcare landscape: embracing innovation in the new health regime

Buying cures versus renting health: Financing health care with consumer loans