Particle physics: Minimalism triumphant.

Frank Wilczek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/496439a

IF: 64.8

2013-01-01

Nature

Abstract:Since the announcement last July that a new kind of particle had been discovered at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, Europe's particle-physics laboratory near Geneva in Switzerland, a much fuller portrait of that particle has emerged. The two main experimental collaborations, ATLAS and CMS, reported a host of measurements in papers and presentations at last month's Moriond conference in La Thuile, Italy1, 2. So far, all results remain consistent with the interpretation that the new particle is the Higgs boson anticipated in the minimal implementation of electroweak symmetry breaking in the standard model of particle physics. The Higgs particle is a rare and fleeting physical phenomenon. Even at the LHC, the particle is produced in less than one-billionth of the proton–proton collisions, and it is highly unstable — its lifetime is inferred to be about 10−22 seconds. To appreciate the significance of the Higgs particle, it is necessary to put it in its proper context — the Higgs mechanism. A central assumption of the standard model, inferred from many experiments, is that the basic forces of nature — the strong, weak and electromagnetic forces, as well as gravity — are mediated by quantum fields of spin 1 or (for gravity) spin 2. It is challenging to accommodate that assumption theoretically, in consistent equations. Naive attempts founder because they predict the existence of violent (quantum) fluctuations in the fields at short distances, which lead to a plague of mathematical infinities in calculations of physical quantities. These difficulties can be avoided only in theories in which the fields have enormous symmetry, called gauge symmetry. Gauge symmetry, however, seems to require that the most basic manifestations of the gauge fields, the minimal concentrations of energy or quanta of the fields, are particles with zero mass. That property holds true in many cases: the photons of electromagnetism, the colour gluons of the strong interaction and the graviton of gravity do seem to have zero mass. But W and Z bosons, the quanta of the fields that are responsible for the weak interaction, have substantial masses. The Higgs mechanism provides a way out of this difficulty. The key observation is that gauge symmetry requires the W and Z bosons to have zero mass only in empty space. Material can slow them down, screen their influence and make them behave as if they have non-zero mass. If an appropriate material fills all space uniformly and stably, the W and Z bosons will never escape its influence — and they will always be observed to have non-zero mass. The hypothesis that such a material does, in fact, fill space is the essence of the Higgs mechanism. But does this material exist? And, if so, what is it made out of? The triumph of the standard-model account of weak interactions, which relies on the Higgs mechanism, has long provided overwhelming, if circumstantial, evidence that the material exists. In recent months, we have learned what it is made out of. Among all the logical possibilities for the new material, the simplest and most economical proposal defines the 'minimal standard model'. In this model, the cosmic material is made from just one ingredient. The terminology in this subject is both confused and in flux, but here the term Higgs particle is used to refer to the unique particle that is introduced to complete the minimal standard model. We can infer a great deal about how the Higgs particle interacts with other forms of matter. After all, because we are embedded in a cosmic material made from Higgs particles, we have observed their en masse effects on matter for a long time. In fact, all properties of the Higgs particle — including its spin and its rate of production — can be, and were, predicted given only its mass. The Higgs particle can be produced in several ways, and it can decay in several ways (Fig. 1). This wealth of possibilities affords many opportunities for observations to test the underlying theory. If the Higgs particle were produced in isolation and in a clean environment, it would be straightforward to observe the rates of each production mechanism and each decay mode, and thereby to test the theory in full detail. High-energy proton–proton collisions, however, are far from that ideal. Even in the rare Higgs-containing collisions, very few of the dozens of particles that are produced have anything to do with the Higgs particle. Tremendous effort has gone into understanding these 'backgrounds', which themselves reflect fundamental processes. As Richard Feynman once said, “yesterday's sensation is today's calibration”, but in these extraordinary conditions successful anticipation of what happens 99.9999999% of the time is as remarkable as the new information contained in the remaining 0.0000001%. Enumeration of all the combinations of production and decay processes that have been observed by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations is not appropriate here. I will briefly describe the two most mature cases, and mention even more briefly a few other results. The announcements of the initial discovery at CERN were based mainly on observation of an excess signal in the two-photon (γγ) decay channel (Fig. 1d) at effective masses of about 125 billion electronvolts, relative both to computed backgrounds and to the measured background at nearby mass values. Although the γγ decay mode is rare for the Higgs particle, it is also difficult to produce high-mass photon pairs by other means, so the background is suppressed. Furthermore, it is possible to measure the energy and direction of photons quite accurately, which has enabled rapid progress in the study of this decay channel. So far, all results1, 2 are consistent with expectations for a Higgs particle having a mass of 125 billion electronvolts. Initial hints that the rate of γγ production through Higgs-particle decay, relative to backgrounds, might exceed theoretical expectations have softened. Although it too represents a small decay fraction, the ZZ decay mode (Fig. 1c) is particularly favourable for study. This is because the Z boson often decays into two charged leptons (electron or muon pairs), whose energy and momentum can be measured accurately. This allows full reconstruction of the underlying process, and comparison of energy and momentum distributions with theoretical predictions. These extra handles help us to address another fundamental property of the Higgs particle: its spin. Theory predicts that the particle should have the quantum numbers of 'empty' space, namely spin 0 and positive parity, because it is a quantum of (apparently) empty space. Detailed study of angular and energy distributions in the ZZ decay have provided strong evidence in favour of spin 0 and positive parity, as anticipated. In the γγ and ZZ channels, quantitative comparison of theory and experiment is at the level of a few tens of per cent. The WW and tau lepton–antilepton (ττ¯) decay channels (Fig. 1b,e) have also been observed, although in the case of the latter the precision is less good. Two dominant themes emerge from these findings. The first is that the LHC machine works beautifully, and that the experimental groups are exploiting it brilliantly. Over the course of a few months, tentative sighting of the Higgs particle has matured into its multifeatured, quantitative portrait. The second is that, so far, every aspect of the emerging portrait is consistent with expectations for the Higgs particle of the minimal standard model. The new results challenge several widely mooted speculations. Models that postulate several main ingredients to the cosmic material (for example, multi-Higgs models), or that postulate complex dynamics to explain the W and Z boson masses (such as Technicolor, extra-dimension and brane-world models) seem less credible, as simplicity and minimalism carry the day. Concerning the most popular and, in my opinion, most promising speculation about physics beyond the minimal standard model that might be accessed at the LHC, supersymmetry, the message is mixed. The observed mass of the Higgs particle is quite low, relative to a priori expectations, as supersymmetry requires. But implementations of supersymmetry that allow a mass as large as 125 billion electronvolts seem to require quite heavy masses for the supersymmetric partner particles, squarks and leptons, perhaps 10–100 teraelectronvolts. Unfortunately, but 'conveniently', that puts them beyond the reach of the LHC. (Other superpartners, the gauginos, might be accessible.) Focus point3 or split4 supersymmetry models, which anticipated this possibility, also suppress many other logically possible, but unobserved, signatures of supersymmetry. The flip side of those negative virtues is that these models compromise one widely advertised advantage of supersymmetry, its potential to ease the hierarchy problem. (The hierarchy problem is the 'unnaturally' tiny value of the W boson mass, relative to the fundamental Planck mass.) With that gone, only unification of couplings5 — an explanation of the relative powers of the strong, weak, electromagnetic and gravitational forces — remains as a firm, reasonably quantitative motivation for supersymmetry. We are unlikely to see notable, qualitatively new results from the LHC in the immediate future because the machine will be out of commission for at least a year while it is upgraded to allow higher collisional energy and luminosity. The second-generation LHC will empower greater accuracy in all the checks of minimalism, and possibly finally deliver supersymmetry — or an unanticipated surprise! Download references