Abstract:BACKGROUND:Copy Number Variations (CNVs) are usually inferred from Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays by use of some software packages based on given algorithms. However, there is no clear understanding of the performance of these software packages; it is therefore difficult to select one or several software packages for CNV detection based on the SNP array platform.We selected four publicly available software packages designed for CNV calling from an Affymetrix SNP array, including Birdsuite, dChip, Genotyping Console (GTC) and PennCNV. The publicly available dataset generated by Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), with a resolution of 24 million probes per sample, was considered to be the "gold standard". Compared with the CGH-based dataset, the success rate, average stability rate, sensitivity, consistence and reproducibility of these four software packages were assessed compared with the "gold standard". Specially, we also compared the efficiency of detecting CNVs simultaneously by two, three and all of the software packages with that by a single software package.RESULTS:Simply from the quantity of the detected CNVs, Birdsuite detected the most while GTC detected the least. We found that Birdsuite and dChip had obvious detecting bias. And GTC seemed to be inferior because of the least amount of CNVs it detected. Thereafter we investigated the detection consistency produced by one certain software package and the rest three software suits. We found that the consistency of dChip was the lowest while GTC was the highest. Compared with the CNVs detecting result of CGH, in the matching group, GTC called the most matching CNVs, PennCNV-Affy ranked second. In the non-overlapping group, GTC called the least CNVs. With regards to the reproducibility of CNV calling, larger CNVs were usually replicated better. PennCNV-Affy shows the best consistency while Birdsuite shows the poorest.CONCLUSION:We found that PennCNV outperformed the other three packages in the sensitivity and specificity of CNV calling. Obviously, each calling method had its own limitations and advantages for different data analysis. Therefore, the optimized calling methods might be identified using multiple algorithms to evaluate the concordance and discordance of SNP array-based CNV calling.

Density Matters: Comparison of Array Platforms for Detection of Copy-Number Variation and Copy-Neutral Abnormalities.

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Oligonucleotide Microarrays for Clinical Diagnosis of Copy Number Variation

Copy Number Aberrations from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 Genotyping Data-How Accurate Are Commonly Used Prediction Approaches?

A Remark on Copy Number Variation Detection Methods

Standardization and Diversification of Copy Number Microarray Testing for Clinical Diagnostics—Implications of the Cross-Platform/Algorithm Study on Clinical Diagnostic Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

Major Copy Proportion Analysis of Tumor Samples Using Snp Arrays

Evaluation of Copy Number Variation Detection for a SNP Array Platform

Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Detection for Single Base Alterations by Oligonucleotide Microarray

Development Of A Focused Oligonucleotide-Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Chip For Clinical Diagnosis Of Genomic Imbalance

Cancer Sample Analysis Utilizing Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Comparative Study of Three PCR-Based Copy Number Variant Approaches , CFMSA , M-PCR , and MLPA , in 22 Q 11 . 2 Deletion Syndrome

Integrated analysis of copy number alteration and RNA expression profiles of cancer using a high-resolution whole-genome oligonucleotide array

Pivotal role of biallelic frequency analysis in identifying copy number alterations using genome-wide methods in tumors with a high level of aneuploidy

Hybridization modeling of oligonucleotide SNP arrays for accurate DNA copy number estimation.

Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation

Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays

Mixhmm: Inferring Copy Number Variation And Allelic Imbalance Using Snp Arrays And Tumor Samples Mixed With Stromal Cells

High Detection Rate of Copy Number Variations Using Capture Sequencing Data: A Retrospective Study

Snp Array Analysis In Hematologic Malignancies: Avoiding False Discoveries

Copy-number-variation and copy-number-alteration region detection by cumulative plots