Abstract:Motivation: Virtual screening of molecular compound libraries is a potentially powerful and inexpensive method for the discovery of novel lead compounds for drug development. The major weakness of virtual screening-the inability to consistently identify true positives (leads)-is likely due to our incomplete understanding of the chemistry involved in ligand binding and the subsequently imprecise scoring algorithms. It has been demonstrated that combining multiple scoring functions (consensus scoring) improves the enrichment of true positives. Previous efforts at consensus scoring have largely focused on empirical results, but they have yet to provide a theoretical analysis that gives insight into real features of combinations and data fusion for virtual screening. Results: We demonstrate that combining multiple scoring functions improves the enrichment of true positives only if (a) each of the individual scoring functions has relatively high performance and (b) the individual scoring functions are distinctive. Notably, these two prediction variables are previously established criteria for the performance of data fusion approaches using either rank or score combinations. This work, thus, establishes a potential theoretical basis for the probable success of data fusion approaches to improve yields in in silico screening experiments. Furthermore, it is similarly established that the second criterion (b) can, in at least some cases, be functionally defined as the area between the rank versus score plots generated by the two (or more) algorithms. Because rank-score plots are independent of the performance of the individual scoring function, this establishes a second theoretically defined approach to determining the likely success of combining data from different predictive algorithms. This approach is, thus, useful in practical settings in the virtual screening process when the performance of at least two individual scoring functions (such as in criterion a) can be estimated as having a high likelihood of having high performance, even if no training sets are available. We provide initial validation of this theoretical approach using data from five scoring systems with two evolutionary docking algorithms on four targets, thymidine kinase, human dihydrofolate reductase, and estrogen receptors of antagonists and agonists. Our procedure is computationally efficient, able to adapt to different situations, and scalable to a large number of compounds as well as to a greater number of combinations. Results of the experiment show a fairly significant improvement (vs single algorithms) in several measures of scoring quality, specifically "goodness-of-hit" scores, false positive rates, and "enrichment". This approach (available online at http://gemdock.life. nctu.edu.tw/dock/download.php) has practical utility for cases where the basic tools are known or believed to be generally applicable, but where specific training sets are absent.

Weighted Equation and Rules--a Novel Concept for Evaluating Protein-Ligand Interaction.

Nonfitting Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Function Based on First-Principles Theoretical Chemistry Methods: Development and Application on Kinase Inhibitors.

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex

Enhance the Performance of Current Scoring Functions with the Aid of 3D Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints.

ET‐score: Improving Protein‐ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance‐weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm

Screening from Tcm Database@Taiwan and Qsar Model for Identifying Her2 Inhibitors

On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein–ligand binding affinities

Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening

Artificial Intelligence Approach to Find Lead Compounds for Treating Tumors

LARMD: Integration of Bioinformatic Resources to Profile Ligand-Driven Protein Dynamics with a Case on the Activation of Estrogen Receptor.

Machine Learning Meets Physics-based Modeling: A Mass-spring System to Predict Protein-ligand Binding Affinity

A novel heuristic of rigid docking scores positively correlates with full-length nuclear receptor LRH-1 regulation

ID-Score: A New Empirical Scoring Function Based on a Comprehensive Set of Descriptors Related to Protein-Ligand Interactions

A comprehensive application: Molecular docking and network pharmacology for the prediction of bioactive constituents and elucidation of mechanisms of action in component-based Chinese medicine

Drug interaction profiles classification: Sørensen–Dice coefficient based on MM/GBSA energies to explore focal adhesion kinase inhibitors

Further Development and Validation of Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Binding Affinity Prediction

Virtual Ligand Screening against Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase: Improving Docking Enrichment Using Physics-Based Methods

A Practical Guide to Molecular Docking and Homology Modelling for Medicinal Chemists

Can Machine Learning Consistently Improve the Scoring Power of Classical Scoring Functions? Insights into the Role of Machine Learning in Scoring Functions.

In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using 3D-QSAR and Molecular Docking