Abstract:Individual heterogeneity (i.e., age and underlying health condition) and contact pattern heterogeneity (i.e., circumstances and frequency of contact) are two crucial aspects of heterogeneous population, which have been demonstrated markedly affect the dynamical process and effectiveness of containing strategy of infectious disease. The former primarily influences susceptibility to the disease, while the latter predominantly controls the spreading process (e.g., "super-spreading" events often occur within households). In this study, we propose a contact data-driven infectious disease spreading model with age structure, underlying health conditions, and containing measures, as well as two types of heterogeneity-based containing strategies for heterogeneous populations. Based on this, a theoretical analysis framework is developed by extending mean-field theory. Using the next-generation matrix method, we estimate the basic reproduction number, finding it to be sensitive to individual heterogeneity, contact pattern heterogeneity, and containing measures. We perform extensive simulations for the spreading of Covid-19 and influenza in 31 cities and find that stronger household infection within contact pattern heterogeneity and the implementation of immunization both lead to a trade-off between the final cumulative infection density (daily infection density peak) and pandemic duration. Individual heterogeneity and contact pattern heterogeneity result in uneven distribution of infection density across different age groups and affect the immunization effects of different immunization strategies. When considering the impact of individual heterogeneity, immunizing only individuals without underlying diseases within each age group is insufficient to achieve optimal control; individuals with underlying diseases should be encouraged to get vaccinated as well. When considering the impact of contact pattern heterogeneity, the results from Anhui indicate that immunizing the 40–59 age group is most effective in the early stages of the epidemic, while overall, immunizing the 20–39 age group is most effective.

How human location-specific contact patterns impact spatial transmission between populations?

The Impact Of Human Location-Specific Contact Pattern On The Sir Epidemic Transmission Between Populations

Modeling Epidemics Spreading on Social Contact Networks

Modeling Human Temporal and Spatial Structured Contacts for Epidemic Prediction

Impact Of Travel Patterns On Epidemic Dynamics In Heterogeneous Spatial Metapopulation Networks

Spatial Heterogeneity and Infection Patterns on Epidemic Transmission Disclosed by a Combined Contact-Dependent Dynamics and Compartmental Model.

Spatiotemporal Transmission Model to Simulate an Interregional Epidemic Spreading

Leveraging Human Mobility Data for Efficient Parameter Estimation in Epidemic Models of COVID-19

Impact of initial outbreak locations on transmission risk of infectious diseases in an intra-urban area

Scaling of contact networks for epidemic spreading in urban transit systems

Urban contact structures for epidemic simulations: Correcting biases in data-driven approaches

Spatial Heterogeneity Can Lead to Substantial Local Variations in COVID-19 Timing and Severity

Infectious disease spreading modeling and containing strategy in heterogeneous population

Interacting Particle Models on the Impact of Spatially Heterogeneous Human Behavioral Factors on Dynamics of Infectious Diseases

Assessing the impact of different contact patterns on disease transmission: Taking COVID-19 as a case

Modeling the spread of infectious disease in urban areas with travel contagion

Epidemic spreading on metapopulation networks considering indirect contact

Persistent Spatial Patterns of Interacting Contagions

Epidemic spreading in heterogeneous networks with recurrent mobility patterns

Human Mobility and Disease Prevalence.

Evolving nature of human contact networks with its impact on epidemic processes