Abstract:BACKGROUND: Preoperative bowel preparation with or without oral antibiotics is controversial in terms of postoperative surgical site infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral antibiotics as adjunct therapy to systemic antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation for preventing surgical site infections in clean contaminated, contaminated, and dirty colorectal procedures. DESIGN: This was a single-center, prospective randomized study. SETTING: This study was conducted at the General Surgery Department at Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, China, from July 15, 2014 to January 20, 2016. PATIENTS: Patients aged >= 18 years scheduled for abdominal surgery with clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty wounds were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the rate of surgical site infections. The secondary outcomes were extra-abdominal complications, duration of postoperative ileus, and readmission rate. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were allocated to each group. Eight and 26 surgical site infections (8.42% vs 27.3 %, p = 0.004) occurred in the mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation groups. Thirteen extra-abdominal complications were reported: 6 in the mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics group and 7 in the mechanical bowel preparation group (6.3% vs 7.3%, p = 0.77). Postoperative ileus duration did not differ between groups (p = 0.23). There were 4 readmissions in the mechanical bowel preparation group and none in the mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics group (p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, blood loss >= 500 mL (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.27-20.4; p = 0.02), ASA score >= 3 (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.2-12.5; p = 0.01), contaminated types (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.5-8.6; p = 0.01), and administration of preoperative oral antibiotics (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.60; p = 0.005) independently affected the incidence of surgical site infections. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study. CONCLUSION: Preoperative oral antibiotics, as adjunct therapy to systemic antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation, significantly reduced surgical site infections and minimized the readmission rates in clean contaminated, contaminated, and dirty types of colorectal surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A437.

[Single-Dose Ceftriaxone Versus Multiple-Dose Cefuroxime for Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection].

Prophylactic Uses of Ceftriaxone in Pulmonary and Esophageal Surgery:a Cost-ef Fectiveness Analysis

Prophylactic cefuroxime in general thoracic surgery

Studies of prophylactic ceftriaxone plasma concentrations in pulmonary and esophageal surgery

Ertapenem Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infections in Elective Colorectal Surgery in China: a Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study.

Cost-minimization Analysis of Cefotaxime Sodium Vs.ciprofloxacin for Preventing Infection in Perioperative Period in the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology

THE STUDY OF PROPHYLAXIS ADMINISTRATION OF CEFTRIAXONE IN COLORECTAI SURGERY

Prophylactic Use of Antibiotics in Selective Colorectal Operation:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Prophylactic Use of Cefazolin for Perioperative Infection in Gynecologic Surgery:A Randomized Controlled Study

Clinical Study of Ceftriaxone Sodium on Prevention of Postoperative Infection of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Comparison of efficacy between ceftriaxone and cefoperazone plus sulbactam in peri-operative treatment of acute suppurative cholangitis

Comparing cefazolin/ metronidazole, piperacillin‐tazobactam, or c efoxitin as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study

Assessing the therapeutic efficacy of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium in managing surgical site infections: a retrospective analysis

A randomized controlled trial to compare antibiotic prophylaxis in elective gynecological surgeries: Single dose of cefazolin versus single dose of cefazolin and tinidazole

Short-Term Versus Long-Term Administration of Single Prophylactic Antibiotic in Elective Gastric Tumor Surgery

Comparison of the efficacy and economy among 3 cephalosporins in type Ⅰincision operation during perioperative period

Choice for prophylactic antibiotics: Cefazolin plus metronidazole or cefoxitin alone for endometrial cancer surgical staging

A Randomized Control Trial of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics As Adjunct Therapy to Systemic Antibiotics for Preventing Surgical Site Infection in Clean Contaminated, Contaminated, and Dirty Type of Colorectal Surgeries

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Antibiotic Application in 230 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A Multi-Center, Controlled, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Study of Levofloxacin for Preventing Infection During the Perioperative Period of Ultrasound-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery