[Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Telbivudine Vs. Lamivudine in Treating the Patients with HBeAg-positive and Negative Chronic Hepatitis B].

Wen Chen,Jin-Lin Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2009.08.003
2009-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate long-term cost effectiveness of telbivudine and lamivudine for the treatment of CHB.METHODS:Cost effectiveness was conducted from social health insurance perspective. A Markov model was established based on disease progression pattern and the data from the 2 years GLOBE clinical trial. The information of annual medical expenditure and quality-of-life assessment for different CHB-related diseases was obtained from literature. Incremental cost per life year or quality-adjusted life year gained was measured.RESULTS:Compared with lamivudine, the incremental cost for 1 additional QALY gained with telbivudine in treating HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB were 5403 yuan and 28239 yuan in Beijing, as well 4916 yuan and 29618 yuan in Guangzhou, respectively. According to national economic burden of CHB-related diseases, the ICER with telbivudine vs lamivudine were 1282 yuan and 31565 yuan for HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB.CONCLUSION:According to WHO recommendation for ICER threshold, telbivudine is cost effective in treating HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB, as compared to lamivudine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?