Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

A Clinical and Histological Study of Bio-Oss in Combination with Guided Bone Regeneration Membrane Technique

Preparation and in Vitro Biological Evaluation of Octacalcium Phosphate/Bioactive Glass-Chitosan/ Alginate Composite Membranes Potential for Bone Guided Regeneration.

Physiochemical Characterization and Biological Effect of Anorganic Bovine Bone Matrix and Organic-Containing Bovine Bone Matrix in Comparison with Bio-Oss in Rabbits

Different bone grafts with guided bone regeneration for treatment of bone defects around implants

[High Bioactive Material-Bone Graft in Bone Defect Healing]

The histomorphometrical analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation using inorganic bovine Bio-Oss~ in human

Clinical Efficacy of Mineralized Collagen (MC) Versus Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) for Immediate Implant Placement in Esthetic Area: a Single-Center Retrospective Study

[Efficacy of Two Barrier Membranes and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral on Bone Regeneration in Extraction Sockets: A Microcomputed Tomographic Study in Dogs].

Effect of Autologous Concentrated Growth Factor Fibrin Solution Combined with Bio-Oss Bone Powder on Mucosal Healing and Bone Regeneration after Oral Implanted Guided Bone Regeneration

Analysis of Osteointegration Strength Between Autogenous Nonvascular Iliac Bone Graft and Simultaneous Implantation Without Guiding Menbrane and Its Clinical Application

Efficacy of positive space acquiring membrane and antimicrobial membrane combined with granular bone substitute implantation in guiding oral bone regeneration

Polydioxanone Membrane Compared with Collagen Membrane for Bone Regeneration

In vivo bone formation assessment using PRP with chitosan

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

Microcomputed tomographic and histologic analysis of anorganic bone matrix coupled with cell-binding peptide suspended in sodium hyaluronate carrier after sinus augmentation: a clinical study

Immunohistochemical characteristics of lateral bone augmentation using different biomaterials around chronic peri-implant dehiscence defects: An experimental in vivo study

Guided bone regeneration in long-bone defect with a bilayer mineralized collagen membrane

Effect of Different Bone Grafting Materials and Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Bone Regeneration: A Micro-Computed Tomography and Histomorphometric Study in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model

Maxillary sinus lift with Bio-Oss alone: a retrospective clinic study

Concentrated Growth Factors in Combination with Particulate Bio-Oss Graft: A Pilot Study on Beagle Dog Alveolar Bone Deficient

[Histomorphometric Evaluation of Ridge Preservation after Molar Tooth Extraction].