Abstract:Histone variant H3.3 differs from the canonical histone H3.1 by only five amino acids, yet its chaperone Death domain-associated protein (DAXX) can specifically recognize H3.3 over H3.1, despite having a large DAXX-interacting surface on the H3.3-H4 heterodimer common to that on the H3.1-H4 complex. This observation gives rise to the question of, from the binding energy point view, how high binding specificity may be achieved with small differences of overall binding energy for protein-protein interactions in general. Here we investigate the mechanism of coupling of binding specificity and affinity in protein-protein interactions using the DAXX-H3.3-H4 complex as a model. Using a multi-scale method, we found that the hydrophobic interactions between DAXX and the H3.3-specific region contributed to their initial binding process. And the structural flexibility of the interacting partners contributed to the binding affinity after their encounter. By quantifying the free energy landscape, we revealed that the interaction between the specific residues of H3.3 and DAXX decreased the encounter barrier height while the folding of H3.3-H4 and DAXX contributed to increase the depth of the free energy basin of the final binding state. The encounter barrier height, which is not coupled to thermodynamic stability of the final binding state, had a marked effect on the initial binding rate of flexible histones and chaperones. Based on the energy landscape theory, we found that the intrinsic binding energy funnel of this uncoupled recognition process was affected by the structural flexibility and the flexibility modulated the degree of coupling between binding specificity and affinity. Our work offers a biophysical explanation of the specific recognition between the histones and their chaperones, and also extends the use of energy landscape theory for understanding molecular recognitions in general.

Structure of the variant histone H3.3–H4 heterodimer in complex with its chaperone DAXX

HIRA vs. DAXX: the two axes shaping the histone H3.3 landscape

The Histone Chaperone Daxx Maintains the Structural Organization of Heterochromatin Domains

DAXX adds a de novo H3.3K9me3 deposition pathway to the histone chaperone network

Histone Variant H3.3: A versatile H3 variant in health and in disease

Energy landscape quantifications of histone H3.3 recognition by chaperon DAXX reveal an uncoupled binding specificity and affinity

Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the Nucleosome Containing Variants H3.3 and H2A.Z

Molecular Mechanism of Histone Variant H2A.B on Stability and Assembly of Nucleosome and Chromatin Structures

Dynamics of histone variant H3.3 and its coregulation with H2A.Z at enhancers and promoters.

Structural Basis of the Chromodomain of Cbx3 Bound to Methylated Peptides from Histone H1 and G9a

Structural Insights into the Association of Hif1 with Histones H2a-H2b Dimer and H3-H4 Tetramer

Crystal structure of DPF3b in complex with an acetylated histone peptide.

Importance of Electrostatic Interactions in the Association of Intrinsically Disordered Histone Chaperone Chz1 and Histone H2A.Z-H2B.

Structural Insights into the Histone H1-Nucleosome Complex

Histone Variants: Making Structurally and Functionally Divergent Nucleosomes and Linkers in Chromatin

Structural basis for recognition of H3K56-acetylated histone H3–H4 by the chaperone Rtt106

Crystal Structure Of The Human Suv39h1 Chromodomain And Its Recognition Of Histone H3k9me2/3

Structural basis for linker histone H5-nucleosome binding and chromatin fiber compaction

Structural Basis of Nucleosome Dynamics Modulation by Histone Variants H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2.

Structural Basis of H2A.Z Recognition by SRCAP Chromatin-Remodeling Subunit YL1.

Histone Variants in Development and Diseases