Abstract: Cloning PCR products into a stable vector is often desirable for subsequent analysis such as high quality DNA sequencing, hybridization studies, expression, modification or further subcloning. A wide variety of strategies have been employed and are available in commercially supplied kits (see Page 30 for a listing of manufacturers of PCR cloning kits or vectors). These approaches include simple but relatively inefficient blunt ligation schemes that rely on the 5′ to 3′ proofreading activities of some enzymes such as Pfu polymerase (Costa and Weiner 1994). These enzymes can be used to create blunt-ended PCR products or to remove the 3′ overhang generated by Taq polymerase, creating “polished ends”. A modification of this approach uses the restriction endonuclease Srf 1 to cleave the vector DNA and then supplies Srf 1 in the ligation buffer to provide a higher steady-state concentration of digested vector, which forces the reaction to proceed in the direction of ligation of the insert, as the ligated product is not digestible by Srf 1 (Simcox 1992). Other recent innovations include the addition of 5′ AATTC tails to PCR primers followed by amplification in a mix containing phosphorothioate dGTP. The PCR product is then digested with Exonuclease III, which removes bases from the 3′ end of the strand until it encounters the protected G, leaving an AATT “sticky end”, perfect for ligation into a vector’s Eco R1 site. Yet another method uses the Lambda phage recombination/integration system rather than ligation as a mechanism for cloning (reviewed in Landy 1989). In this approach, attB sites are incorporated into the PCR primers and attP sites are added to the vector. When the PCR product, vector, and Lambda phage integrase (Int) are combined, the PCR product is inserted into the vector in a site-specific manner. The same system can then be used with Lambda phage excisionase (Xis) to remove the insert for transfer to a different vector. Finally, restriction endonucleases, such as Earn 1104 I, which cuts at a defined distance from its recognition site (but not within its site) are used in PCR primers to allow specific “sticky ends” to be produced (Padgett and Sorge 1996). However, most of these approaches are either inefficient, or require the use of proprietary vectors, enzymes, or reagents and are often costly.

Inverse PCR: Cdna Cloning

Rapid Assembly of Multiple-Exon Cdna Directly from Genomic DNA.

Amplification and Cloning by Long Rt-Pcr of Full-Length Genome of Larger Segment of Chicken Infectious Bursal Disease Virus

An Alternative Method for Cdna Cloning from Surrogate Eukaryotic Cells Transfected with the Corresponding Genomic DNA

The Polymerase Chain Reaction: DNA Extraction and Amplification

Cloning PCR Products

PCR-based cDNA library construction: general cDNA libraries at the level of a few cells.

In vivo cloning of PCR product via site-specific recombination in Escherichia coli

Classical Recombinant DNA Cloning

PCR-enriched Cdna Pool Method for Cloning of Gene Homologues

Estimation of Techniques about Cloning the Flanking DNA Sequence

High-throughput FastCloning technology: A low-cost method for parallel cloning

Rapid Restriction Enzyme-Free Cloning of PCR Products: A High-Throughput Method Applicable for Library Construction

Long Distance-inverse PCR Technique for Efficient Cloning of Flanking Sequences Adjacent to Known DNA Fragments

An Efficient and Rapid Method for Cdna Cloning from Difficult Templates Using Codon Optimization and SOE-PCR: with Human RANK and TIMP2 Gene As Examples

Molecular cloning using polymerase chain reaction, an educational guide for cellular engineering

Simplified plasmid cloning with a universal MCS design and bacterial in vivo assembly

A Practical Comparison of Ligation-Independent Cloning Techniques

A Preferable Approach To Clone Hlif Cdna From The Genomic Dna

DNA Cloning by Homologous Recombination in Escherichia Coli

A New Approach for Cloning Hlif Cdna from Genomic DNA Isolated from the Oral Mucous Membrane.