Aspirin As a Promising Drug for Slow Coronary Flow

Qixia Jiang,Feng Wu,Zonggui Wu,Chun Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2012.07.022
IF: 4.7
2012-01-01
Medical Hypotheses
Abstract:Slow coronary flow (SCF) is characterized by delayed contrast dye opacification without significant stenosis of epicardial coronary arteries, and could be an early marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. Although previous studies have reported only a 1% prevalence [1], a more recent systematic evaluation by this group suggests that it is approximately 3% [2]. SCF reveals various clinical presentations such as unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and microvascular angina [3,4]. However, the pathophysiology and clinical implication of SCF are not fully understood. Potential causes include endothelial inflammation, small vessel disease, diffuse atherosclerosis, platelet dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, and vasomotor dysfunction [5–7]. Despite the availability of effective symptomatic drugs, there is presently no pathological mechanism-based drug treatment for SCF. Acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin) has been the drug of choice for over half a century for the primary and secondary prophylaxis of thrombotic events. It has now become one of the most powerful pharmacological strategies in the treatment of the cardiovascular disease. Its principal mechanism of action is thought to be anti-inflammatory effects and anti-oxidation. Because patients with SCF expressed the significantly lower total antioxidant status and higher oxidative stress [8,9], the above effects are in consistence with possible underlying mechanism of SCF [10,11]. The second property of aspirin is scavenging free radical [12]. Literatures report that free radical damage may be responsible for the pathological findings associated with microvascular dysfunction and SCF [13,14]. The third capacity of aspirin is inhibition of platelet aggregation, which are related to the etiopathogenic mechanisms of SCF. Because increased platelet aggregability, elevated mean platelet volume and platelet function disorder might be independent predictors for the presence of SCF [15–17]. Therefore, we hypotheses that aspirin may be beneficial for patients with SCF due to its pharmacological basis. As far as we know, there is no study investigating the effects of aspirin in SCF. Only one literature reported that SCF patients treated with either aspirin alone or aspirin plus nebivolol were free of angina after treatment. The author thought that aspirin might affect the dynamic nature of SCF [18]. All together, properties of aspirin, related to the etiopathogenic mechanisms of SCF, and the clinical evidence that aspirin made the patients with SCF free of angina makes aspirin as a promising drug to treat SCF. Further confirmation of our hypothesis still needs lots of clinical observation and basic researches. And the therapeutic dose of aspirin in SCF and its safety must be evaluated carefully.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?