Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on perioperative and follow-up outcomes of achalasia patients undergoing unsuccessful prior treatment.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 849 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM and completed follow-up at endoscopy center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, from August 2010 to December 2014. The effect of POEM was compared between patients with prior treatment (n=245) and those without (n=604). Risk factors for perioperative major adverse events, postoperative clinical reflux and failure were analyzed.Results:A total of 34 patients (4.0%, 34/849) experienced major adverse events, such as pneumothorax, hydrothorax, delayed bleeding. No statistical difference in major adverse events was found between the two groups [4.5% (11/245) VS 3.8% (23/604), χ2=0.21, P=0.65]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that procedure duration ≥60 min was the independent risk factor for perioperative major adverse events ( OR=3.82, 95% CI: 1.81-8.08, P<0.05), while endoscopist experience >100 cases was the independent protective factor for major adverse events ( OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.76, P<0.05). During a median follow-up of 23 months (ranging 1-71 months), clinical reflux occurred in 203 patients (23.9%, 203/849), and clinical failure occurred in 94 patients (11.1%, 94/849). Patients with prior treatment had a clinical reflux rate of 26.9% (66/245), which was comparable with those without (22.7%, 137/604) ( P=0.19). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Heller myotomy was the independent risk factor for clinical reflux ( OR=1.49, 95% CI: 0.98-2.29, P=0.07). Clinical failure rate in patients with prior treatment at 5 years after POEM was 18.0% (44/245), and that in those without was 8.3% (50/604) ( P<0.05). Multivariate cox analysis revealed that disease duration ≥10 years ( HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.04-2.52, P=0.03) and prior treatment ( HR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.26-2.88, P<0.05) were independent risk factors for clinical failure. Conclusion:POEM is an effective and safe rescue for patients who underwent unsuccessful prior treatment, with a low rate of perioperative major adverse events and good long-term effects. Prior treatment may increase the risk for clinical failure of POEM, it may not significantly increase severe perioperative complications or clinical reflux though.

[Effects of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy on Esophageal Dynamics in Patients with Esophageal Achalasia].

Dynamic Changes in Esophageal Manometry of Achalasia Patients Receiving Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Improvement of Endoscopical Therapy for Achalasia

Bypassing Large Submucosal Vessels During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Reduces Operative Time and Intraoperative Blood Loss in Patients with Achalasia

Effectiveness of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in the Treatment of Achalasia: A Pilot Trial in Chinese Han Population with a Minimum of One‐year Follow‐up

Long-term Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy on Achalasia in Pediatric Patients

[Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Report of 42 Cases].

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treating Achalasia Performed by a Gastroenterologist: 4 Yearsʼ Experience from a Single Endoscopy Center

Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on achalasia with ineffective prior treatment

Effects of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy on Achalasia in Geriatric Patients

Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months

The Effect of Prior Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Achalasia Undergoing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

The Preliminary Evaluation of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Via Posterior Wall of Esophagus for Cardia Achalasia

The relationship between cardiac muscularis propria and clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia: initial results of a korean study

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a clinical comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy.

Clinical impact of esophageal muscle thickness on peroral endoscopic myotomy patients

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Abnormalities and Esophageal Motility Recovery After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia

Long-term efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia under different criteria

498 PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: a Clinical Comparative Study of Endoscopic Full-Thickness and Circular Muscle Myotomy

Short-term Safety and Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia in Children