Health‐related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Outcomes of Selective/Nonselective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke 1C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients with a Minimum 4‐year Follow‐up
Chuan Luo,Zhipeng Deng,Junhu Li,Zhuhai Li,Lihang Wang,Liyu Ran,Yueming Song,Shishu Huang,Lei Wang,Litai Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13977
2024-01-10
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:This study followed patients with Lenke C scoliosis for at least 4 years, after 4–10 years of follow‐up, we found that the postoperative lumbar curve correction rate improved to 67.7% at the last follow‐up. HRQOLs suggested that patients who underwent STF had a higher overall score than those who underwent NSTF. Objective Both the selective thoracic fusion (STF) and nonselective thoracic fusion (NSTF) are treatments for Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). To date, the impacts of the two surgical strategies on patients' long‐term quality of life remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the long‐term effects of STF/NSTF on the quality of life in Lenke 1C AIS patients through a 4–10‐year follow‐up. Methods From January 2011 to April 2018, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a retrospective single‐center study of 75 surgical patients with Lenke 1C curves was performed (n = 75). They all underwent posterior fusion, and patients were divided into the selective thoracic fusion (STF) group (n = 42) and the nonselective thoracic fusion (NSTF) group (n = 33) based on their surgical approach. All participants received the survey of the visual analogue scale (VAS), SRS30, SF12, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scales. Patients' gender, age, body mass index (BMI), surgical approach (STF/NSTF), surgical segments (UIV and LIV), follow‐up time, complications, preoperative, postoperative, and last follow‐up Cobb angles, and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were collected, and analyzed through the Shapiro‐Wilks test, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, t‐test, and χ2 test. Results The mean follow‐up of the entire cohort was 73 ± 5.6 months. The lumbar Cobb angle in the STF group improved from 31.8 ± 6.5° to 11.5 ± 5.1° after the operation and 10.3 ± 6.9° at the last follow‐up. The postoperative correction rate of the lumbar curve was 63.8%, which increased to 67.7% at the last follow‐up. In the NSTF group, the lumbar Cobb angle improved from 34.3 ± 11.3° to 4.3 ± 3.7° after the operation, and was 5.1 ± 3.1° at the last follow‐up. The postoperative correction rate of the lumbar curve was 87.4%, and 85.1% at the last follow‐up. At the last follow‐up, the STF group had higher overall HRQOL scores than the NSTF group, and there were statistically differences between the different groups (STF/NSTF) in SRS‐30‐Mental health (p = 0.03), SRS‐30‐Satisfaction with management (p = 0.02), SRS‐30‐Pain (p = 0.03), ODI (p = 0.01), SF‐12 PCS (p = 0.03), VAS back pain (p = 0.005) and VAS leg pain (p = 0.001). No statistically differences were found in SF12 MCS, SRS‐30‐Self‐image/Appearance and SRS‐30 Function/activity. Conclusion After 4–10 years of follow‐up, we found that the STF group achieved satisfactory correction results, and compared with the NSTF group, their overall HRQOL scores were higher, especially in terms of pain and satisfaction, where the STF group shows a significant advantage.
orthopedics