Abstract:In type 1 diabetes management, the availability of algorithms capable of accurately forecasting future blood glucose (BG) concentrations and hypoglycemic episodes could enable proactive therapeutic actions, e.g., the consumption of carbohydrates to mitigate, or even avoid, an impending critical event. The only input of this kind of algorithm is often continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor data, because other signals (such as injected insulin, ingested carbs, and physical activity) are frequently unavailable. Several predictive algorithms fed by CGM data only have been proposed in the literature, but they were assessed using datasets originated by different experimental protocols, making a comparison of their relative merits difficult. The aim of the present work was to perform a head-to-head comparison of thirty different linear and nonlinear predictive algorithms using the same dataset, given by 124 CGM traces collected over 10 days with the newest Dexcom G6 sensor available on the market and considering a 30-min prediction horizon. We considered the state-of-the art methods, investigating, in particular, linear black-box methods (autoregressive; autoregressive moving-average; and autoregressive integrated moving-average, ARIMA) and nonlinear machine-learning methods (support vector regression, SVR; regression random forest; feed-forward neural network, fNN; and long short-term memory neural network). For each method, the prediction accuracy and hypoglycemia detection capabilities were assessed using either population or individualized model parameters. As far as prediction accuracy is concerned, the results show that the best linear algorithm (individualized ARIMA) provides accuracy comparable to that of the best nonlinear algorithm (individualized fNN), with root mean square errors of 22.15 and 21.52 mg/dL, respectively. As far as hypoglycemia detection is concerned, the best linear algorithm (individualized ARIMA) provided precision = 64%, recall = 82%, and one false alarm/day, comparable to the best nonlinear technique (population SVR): precision = 63%, recall = 69%, and 0.5 false alarms/day. In general, the head-to-head comparison of the thirty algorithms fed by CGM data only made using a wide dataset shows that individualized linear models are more effective than population ones, while no significant advantages seem to emerge when employing nonlinear methodologies.

Predicting subcutaneous glucose concentration using a latent-variable-based statistical method for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Predictive Glucose Monitoring for Type 1 Diabetes Using Latent Variable-Based Multivariate Statistical Analysis

Enhancing Blood Glucose Prediction with Meal Absorption and Physical Exercise Information

Online Prediction of Subcutaneous Glucose Concentration for Type 1 Diabetes Using Empirical Models and Frequency‐band Separation

Interindividual Glucose Dynamics in Different Frequency Bands for Online Prediction of Subcutaneous Glucose Concentration in Type 1 Diabetic Subjects

Blood Glucose Prediction from Nutrition Analytics in Type 1 Diabetes: A Review

Blood Glucose Prediction with Variance Estimation Using Recurrent Neural Networks

The Challenge of Predicting Meal-to-meal Blood Glucose Concentrations for Patients with Type I Diabetes

Personalized Glucose Prediction with Clustering-Based Domain Adaptation for Type 2 Diabetes

Blood glucose forecasting from temporal and static information in children with T1D

Machine Learning based prediction of Glucose Levels in Type 1 Diabetes Patients with the use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data

Glucose Prediction for Type 1 Diabetes Using KLMS Algorithm

Incorporating Glucose Variability into Glucose Forecasting Accuracy Assessment Using the New Glucose Variability Impact Index and the Prediction Consistency Index: An LSTM Case Example

Improving blood glucose level predictability using machine learning

Prediction of personalised postprandial glycaemic response in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Forecasting of Glucose Levels and Hypoglycemic Events: Head-to-Head Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Data-Driven Algorithms Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Only

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Nocturnal High- and Low-Glucose Prediction in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Deep transfer learning and data augmentation improve glucose levels prediction in type 2 diabetes patients

Deep learning and regression approaches to forecasting blood glucose levels for type 1 diabetes

Prediction of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes under Multiple Daily Injections Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Physical Activity Monitor

Study of Short-Term Personalized Glucose Predictive Models on Type-1 Diabetic Children