Abstract:Understanding the mechanisms that dictate the localization of cytoskeletal filaments is crucial for elucidating cell shape regulation in prokaryotes. The actin homolog MreB plays a pivotal role in maintaining the shape of many rod-shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli by directing cell-wall synthesis according to local curvature cues. However, the basis of MreB's curvature-dependent localization has remained elusive. Here, we develop a biophysical model for the energetics of filament binding to a surface that integrates the complex interplay between filament twist and bending and the two-dimensional surface geometry. Our model predicts that the spatial localization of a filament like MreB with substantial intrinsic twist is governed by both the mean and Gaussian curvatures of the cell envelope, which strongly covary in rod-shaped cells. Using molecular dynamics simulations to estimate the mechanical properties of MreB filaments, we show that their thermodynamic preference for regions with lower mean and Gaussian curvatures matches experimental observations for physiologically relevant filament lengths of ∼50 nm. We find that the experimentally measured statistical curvature preference is maintained in the absence of filament motion and after a cycle of depolymerization, repolymerization, and membrane rebinding, indicating that equilibrium energetics can explain MreB localization. These findings provide critical insights into the physical principles underlying cytoskeletal filament localization, and suggest new design principles for synthetic shape sensing nanomaterials. Significance statement:The protein MreB, a homolog of eukaryotic actin, regulates the shape of bacteria like Escherichia coli by guiding new cell-wall insertion based on local curvature cues. However, the mechanism by which a nanometer-scale MreB filament "senses" the micron-scale curvature of the cell wall has remained a mystery. We introduce a biophysical model of the energetics of twisted and bent filaments bound to curved surfaces, which predicts that localization of filaments like MreB is sensitive to both mean and Gaussian curvature. The model captures experimentally measured curvature enrichment patterns and explains how MreB naturally localizes to saddle-shaped regions without energy-consuming processes. Beyond cell shape regulation, our work suggests design principles for synthetic systems that can sense and respond to surface shape.

External push and internal pull forces recruit curvature-sensing N-BAR domain proteins to the plasma membrane

A PH domain in ACAP1 possesses key features of the BAR domain in promoting membrane curvature.

Estimation of anisotropic bending rigidities and spontaneous curvatures of crescent curvature-inducing proteins from tethered-vesicle experimental data

Binding of Curvature-Inducing Proteins onto Biomembranes

Membrane curvature catalyzes actin nucleation through nano-scale condensation of N-WASP-FBP17

A continuum membrane model can predict curvature sensing by helix insertion

Spatiotemporal dynamics of membrane surface charge regulates cell polarity and migration

A single particle analysis method for detecting membrane remodelling and curvature sensing

Clathrin Senses Membrane Curvature

Curvature sensing of curvature-inducing proteins with internal structure

Binding of anisotropic curvature-inducing proteins onto membrane tubes

Biophysical modeling of membrane curvature generation and curvature sensing by the glycocalyx

Sensing the Shape of a Surface by Intracellular Filaments

Insights into Membrane Curvature Sensing and Membrane Remodeling by Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Protein Regions

Delineating the shape of COPII coated membrane bud

Coiling of cellular protrusions around extracellular fibers

Vesiculation mechanisms mediated by anisotropic proteins

Cell monolayers sense curvature by exploiting active mechanics and nuclear mechanoadaptation

Membrane mediated aggregation of curvature inducing nematogens and membrane tubulation

Rigidity of Wedge Loop in PACSIN 3 Protein Is a Key Factor in Dictating Diameters of Tubules