Abstract:Background: Implant therapy is a highly predictable treatment option; however, insufficient data exist to show whether flapless implant surgery provides better esthetic outcomes and less bone loss than implant surgery with a flap approach. Methods: In this randomized, controlled study comparing the flapless and traditional flap protocol for implant placement, 24 patients received a single implant in the anterior maxillary region. A cone beam computed tomography-aided surgical guide was used for implant placement surgery for both groups. Implants were restored using a one-piece, screw-retained ceramic crown at 3 months. Radiographic and clinical measurements were assessed at baseline (implant placement) and at 3 (crown placement), 6, 9, and 15 months. Clinical parameters evaluated were plaque index, gingival index, papillary index (PPI) (0 = no papilla, 1 = less than half, 2 = more than half but not complete, 3 = complete fill, and 4 = overfill), marginal tissue levels, biotype, width of keratinized tissue, and soft tissue thickness. Results: Implant success rate was 92% in both groups. Mean PPI values for the flap control group and flapless test group were 2.38 ± 0.51 versus 2.31 ± 0.48 at crown placement (P = 0.68) and 2.52 ± 0.52 versus 2.64 ± 0.54 at 15 months (P = 0.42), respectively. PPI increased over time in both groups, although the flapless group had a significantly larger change in PPI from crown placement to 6 and 9 months (P <0.01). Crestal bone levels in the flap group were more apical in relation to the implant platform than those in the flapless group for the duration of the study. No differences among groups were noted for all other measurements. Conclusions: Both flapless and flap implant placement protocols resulted in high success rates. A flapless protocol may provide a better short-term esthetic result, although there appears to be no long-term advantage.

[Clinical Study of Application of Platform Switching to Dental Implant Treatment in Esthetic Zone].

Impact of Two Implant-Abutment Connection Types on Crestal Bone Stability: A 3-Year Comparative Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

A Retrospective Study of Six Fractured Platform-Switching Abutments

[Influence of the Placing Depth of Implants with Platform Switching on the Marginal Bone Level in the Posterior Mandible: a Clinical Study].

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded maxillary anterior single-tooth bone-level implants

Influence of Platform-Switched, Laser-Microtextured Implant on Marginal Bone Level: A 24-Month Case Series Study

Minimally Invasive Extraction and Immediate Implant Placement with Single-Stage Surgical Procedure:A Clinical Observation of 21 Cases

Assessment of Bone Loss Around Platform-Switching Subcrestal Implants: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Research progress of crestal bone absorption of implant and platform switching design

[Clinical Effect Evaluation of Immediate Implant and Immediate Restoration with Socket-Shield Technique in Aesthetic Area: a Retrospective Study with Up to 5-Year Follow-Up].

Comparing Conventional Flap-Less Immediate Implantation and Socket-Shield Technique for Esthetic and Clinical Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Study

Clinical Application of Angulated Prosthetic Platform Implants: A Retrospective Study

Clinical Study of Combined Tooth-implant-supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis

Effect of flapless surgery on single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial

Rehabilitation Using Implants with Sloped Platform Edge vs. Standard Platform with Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments

A retrospective radiographic study on the effect of natural tooth-implant proximity and an introduction to the concept of a bone-loading platform switch

One-Year Outcomes of Subcrestal Platform-Switched Implants With and Without Sterile Prosthetic Abutments: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A Clinical Study of Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement in the Periodontally Compromised Patients

[Clinical Evaluation of Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Anterior Region].

Use of Custom-Made Transfer Coping for Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Management in Maxillary Implant Esthetic Restoration