Abstract:Malocclusions are common craniofacial malformations that cause quality of life and health problems if left untreated. Unfortunately, the current treatment for severe skeletal malocclusion is invasive surgery. Developing improved therapeutic options requires a deeper understanding of the cellular mechanisms responsible for determining jaw bone length. We have recently shown that neural crest mesenchyme (NCM) can alter jaw length by controlling the recruitment and function of mesoderm-derived osteoclasts. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling is critical to craniofacial development by directing bone resorption and formation, and heterozygous mutations in the TGF-β type I receptor ( TGFBR1 ) are associated with micrognathia in humans. To identify the role of TGF-β signaling in NCM in controlling osteoclasts during mandibular development, the mandibles of mouse embryos deficient in the gene encoding Tgfbr1 , specifically in NCM, were analyzed. Our laboratory and others have demonstrated that Tgfbr1 fl/fl ;Wnt1-Cre mice display significantly shorter mandibles with no condylar, coronoid, or angular processes. We hypothesize that TGF-β signaling in NCM can also direct late bone remodeling and further regulate late embryonic jaw bone length. Interestingly, analysis of mandibular bone based on micro-computed tomography and Masson's trichrome revealed no significant difference in bone quality between the Tgfbr1 fl/fl ;Wnt1-Cre mice and controls, as measured by the bone perimeter/bone area, trabecular rod-like diameter, number and separation, and gene expression of collagen type 1 alpha 1 ( Col1α1 ) and matrix metalloproteinase 13 ( Mmp13 ). Although there was not a difference in localization of bone resorption within the mandible indicated by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, Tgfbr1 fl/fl ;Wnt1-Cre mice had approximately three-fold less osteoclast number and perimeter than controls. Gene expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-β ( Rank ) and Mmp9 , markers of osteoclasts and their activity, also showed a three-fold decrease in Tgfbr1 fl/fl ;Wnt1-Cre mandibles. Evaluation of osteoblast-to-osteoclast signaling revealed no significant difference between Tgfbr1 fl/fl ;Wnt1-Cre mandibles and controls, leaving the specific mechanism unresolved. Finally, pharmacological inhibition of Tgfbr1 signaling during the initiation of bone mineralization and resorption significantly shortened jaw length in embryos. We conclude that TGF-β signaling in NCM decreases mesoderm-derived osteoclast number, that TGF-β signaling in NCM impacts jaw length late in development, and that this osteoblast-to-osteoclast communication may be occurring through an undescribed mechanism.

Receptor‐regulated and Inhibitory Smads Are Critical in Regulating Transforming Growth Factorβ–mediated Meckel's Cartilage Development

Tgf-Beta and Bmp Signaling in Osteoblast, Skeletal Development, and Bone Formation, Homeostasis and Disease

TGF‐β/SMAD signaling inhibits intermittent cyclic mechanical tension‐induced degeneration of endplate chondrocytes by regulating the miR‐455‐5p/RUNX2 axis

Localization of Smads, the TGF-beta family intracellular signaling components during endochondral ossification.

Antagonistic Effects of Smad2 Versus Smad7 Are Sensitive to Their Expression Level During Tooth Development.

Smad Signaling in Mesenchymal and Chondroprogenitor Cells

Negative regulation of otic capsule chondrogenesis: it can make you Smad

Smad4 is required to regulate the fate of cranial neural crest cells

RhoA/Rho Kinase Signaling Regulates Transforming Growth Factor-Β1-induced Chondrogenesis and Actin Organization of Synovium-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Through Interaction with the Smad Pathway

SMAD3 and SMAD4 have a more dominant role than SMAD2 in TGFβ-induced chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Smad7 Modulates Tgf Beta Signaling During Cranial Suture Development To Maintain Suture Patency

TGF-beta/Smad3 Signals Repress Chondrocyte Hypertrophic Differentiation and Are Required for Maintaining Articular Cartilage.

Spatial and temporal expression of Smad signaling members during the development of mandibular condylar cartilage.

Regulation of TGF-β Superfamily Signaling by Inhibitory Smads

TAK1 is an Essential Regulator of BMP Signalling in Cartilage.

Smad2 and Smad3 Have Differential Sensitivity in Relaying TGFβ Signaling and Inversely Regulate Early Lineage Specification

Signaling of Transforming Growth Factor‐β Family Members Through Smad Proteins

Regulation of TGF- signaling by Smad7

TGF-β signaling in the cranial neural crest affects late-stage mandibular bone resorption and length

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Signaling Regulates Epiphyseal Cartilage Development through β-Catenin-dependent and -independent Pathways

Regulation of embryonic endochondral ossification by Smurf2