Retrospective Analysis Between Low Birth Weight and Quality of Prenat al Care
HAN Zhen,LI Bing-lin,LEI Chun-mei,WANG Yu,LI Xue-lan,GOU Wen-li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.02.004
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the relationship between low birth weight(LBW)(birth weight <2500 g) and the quality of prenatal care.Methods According to Kessner's Adequency of Prenatal Care Inde x,prenatal care quality of 2964 pregnancy women with single pregnancy who re ceiv ed prenatal examination at First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College,Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2008 to December 2009 were included into this s tudy.All of them had the survey about Prenatal Examination Questionnaire.A total of 2928 valid questionnaires were collected after excluding questionaires with missing items ≥5.The recovery rate was 98.79%.The qualified 2928 questio nnaires were classified three groups according to different prenatal examination quality:Adequate group(n=1262),intermediate group(n=1502) and inade quate group(n=164).General information,prenatal examination,gestational and de livery status within 2-7 d after delivery were analyzed retros pectively.The relationship between LBW related risk factors and prenatal examination were anal yzed by non-conditional logistic regression.The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of First Affiliated Ho spital of Medical College,Xi'an Jiao Tong University.Informed consent was obta ined from all participants.Results Incidence rates of LBW was 3.49%(44/1262) for adequate group,5.26%(79/1502) for intermediate group,and 1 9.51%(32.164) for inadequate group.The inadequate group had the highest inciden ce rate of LBW infant compared with those in the other two groups(P< 0.01).Close correlation risk factors to LBW infant including:Maternal age,mar ital status,pregnancy complications,hospital delivery,gestational weight g ain,and gestational weeks of delivery(r=0.83,0.69,0.85,-0.68,-0.71,-0.74;P<0.05).The rate of LBW had no correlation with parity(r=0.26,P>0.05).There had significant differences between LBW infants and normal in fants(birth weight ≥2500 g) on mean times of maternal prenatal care quality,m aternal age,marital status,parity,pregnancy complications,hospital delivery,gest ati onal weight gain,and pregnancy week delivery(χ2=96.05,58.84,21.41,52.38,38.10,33.44,66.32,258.42,P<0.05).Compared with normal birth weight infants,the mean times of prenatal care was lower than that in LBW infants [(7.6±3.1) vs.(5.4±2.9);t=9.16,P<0.01].The prevalence of LBW infant in adequate group was lower than that in intermediate group(OR=0.51,95% CI:0.35-0.72).After adjusting maternal age,marital status,pregnancy com plications,gestational weight gain,hospital delivery and gestational age,a significant increased risk of LBW remained for infants of women with inadequate prenatal care(OR=4.56,95%CI:3.02-6.84).Conclusions Kessner's Adequency of Prenatal Care Index was more objective and accur ate to evaluate the quality of prenatal care.Inadequately prenatal care was an independent effect on LBW.