Over-expression of RPL23 in myelodysplastic syndromes is associated with apoptosis resistance of CD34 + cells and predicts poor prognosis and distinct response to CHG chemotherapy or decitabine

Lingyun Wu,Xiao Li,Feng Xu,Chunkang Chang,Qi He,Zheng Zhang,Yan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1486-2
2012-01-01
Annals of Hematology
Abstract:Ribosomal protein (RP) L23 has been suggested to be a negative regulator of cell apoptosis. In the present study, we analyzed RPL23 expression in 169 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) by using real-time PCR. The apoptosis of CD34 + marrow cells was examined by flow cytometry, and the correlation between RPL23 expression levels and apoptosis in CD34 + cells was assessed. We then analyzed the clinical significance of RPL23 expression for predicting disease progression and patient survival as well as therapeutic response in patients administered with a cytarabine, homoharringtonine, and G-CSF (CHG) regimen or decitabine therapy. Increased RPL23 expression was found in patients with higher-risk MDS than in patients with lower-risk disease ( p = 0.004). RPL23 expression levels were found being inversely correlated with decreased apoptotic ratio of CD34 + cells in higher-risk patients ( r = −0.672, p < 0.001). Compared to patients with normal RPL23 expression levels, those with increased RPL23 expression presented higher rates of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia ( p = 0.005) and reduced 2-year survival rates ( p = 0.012). Multivariate regression analysis showed that RPL23 expression level was an independent predictor of prognosis, regardless of patient age, IPSS score, or hemoglobin level. Moreover, patients with RPL23 over-expression appeared to have lower response rates to CHG chemotherapy ( p = 0.027) but similar response rates to decitabine treatment. In conclusion, the over-expression of RPL23 might confer apoptosis resistance in CD34 + cells, which may lead to disease progression and adverse prognosis in MDS. Increased RPL23 expression was an inverse indicator for CHG regimen, but not for decitabine treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?