Abstract:Background: The determining effect of facial hard tissues on soft tissue morphology in orthodontic patients has yet to be explained. The aim of this study was to clarify the hard-soft tissue relationships of the lower 1/3 of the face in skeletal Class II-hyperdivergent patients compared with those in Class I-normodivergent patients using network analysis. Methods: Fifty-two adult patients (42 females, 10 males; age, 26.58 ± 5.80 years) were divided into two groups: Group 1, 25 subjects, skeletal Class I normodivergent pattern with straight profile; Group 2, 27 subjects, skeletal Class II hyperdivergent pattern with convex profile. Pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional facial scans were taken and superimposed, on which landmarks were identified manually, and their coordinate values were used for network analysis. Results: (1) In sagittal direction, Group 2 correlations were generally weaker than Group 1. In both the vertical and sagittal directions of Group 1, the most influential hard tissue landmarks to soft tissues were located between the level of cemento-enamel junction of upper teeth and root apex of lower teeth. In Group 2, the hard tissue landmarks with the greatest influence in vertical direction were distributed more forward and downward than in Group 1. (2) In Group 1, all the correlations for vertical-hard tissue to sagittal-soft tissue position and sagittal-hard tissue to vertical-soft tissue position were positive. However, Group 2 correlations between vertical-hard tissue and sagittal-soft tissue positions were mostly negative. Between sagittal-hard tissue and vertical-soft tissue positions, Group 2 correlations were negative for mandible, and were positive for maxilla and teeth. Conclusion: Compared with Class I normodivergent patients with straight profile, Class II hyperdivergent patients with convex profile had more variations in soft tissue morphology in sagittal direction. In vertical direction, the most relevant hard tissue landmarks on which soft tissue predictions should be based were distributed more forward and downward in Class II hyperdivergent patients with convex profile. Class II hyperdivergent pattern with convex profile was an imbalanced phenotype concerning sagittal and vertical positions of maxillofacial hard and soft tissues.

[Individual Studies of Parent-Offspring Similarity in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion].

THE STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRANIAL BASE AND ANGLE CLASS II AND III MALOCCLUSION

Study on the correlation between the structure of TMJ and vertical craniofaciai pattern, occlusion in Class Ⅱ1 Children

A factor analysis of craniomaxillary components of class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion

[Condylar Morphology with Different Vertical Facial Types of Skeletal III Malocclusions in Mixed Dentition].

The cranial base and maxillofacial morphology of Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion

Familial Aggregation of Skeletal Angle III Malocclusion

Archform Comparisons Between Skeletal Class Ii and Iii Malocclusions

[A Study of Consistency of Occlusal Type with Skeletal Pattern and Integumental Profile].

Diagnostic template research of craniofacial characters of Class Ⅱ patients

Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in skeletal classⅡmalocclu-sions

Network analysis of three-dimensional hard-soft tissue relationships in the lower 1/3 of the face: skeletal Class I-normodivergent malocclusion versus Class II-hyperdivergent malocclusion

[Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Relationship Between Dental and Basal Arch Forms in Skeletal Class II Malocclusions].

[Craniofacial characters for Angle's class II malocclusion using Procrusts superimposition and multivariate statistics].

Familial aggregation of Skeletal Angle Ⅲ Malocclusion.

Temporomandibular Joint Osseous Morphology of Class I and Class II Malocclusions in the Normal Skeletal Pattern: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects

A Preliminary Study of Buccal and Lingual Alveolar Bone Thickness of Posterior Teeth in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion and Mandibular Asymmetry

Study of Cranioficial Structure by Anteroposterior Cephalometric Analysis in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Patients

Diagnostic Criteria for Pseudo–class III Malocclusion

A Preliminary Study of Skeletal Symmetry in Patients with Skeletal Class Ⅲ and Class Ⅰ Malocclusions Based on Cone-Beam CT Images