Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacodynamic Biomarker Study of Sorafenib in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma

Olwen M. Hahn,Cheng Yang,Milica Medved,Gregory Karczmar,Emily Kistner,Theodore Karrison,Elizabeth Manchen,Myrosia Mitchell,Mark J. Ratain,Walter M. Stadler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.15.5655
IF: 45.3
2008-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:PurposeSorafenib is an antiangiogenic agent with activity in renal cancer. We conducted a randomized trial to investigate dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as a pharmacodynamic biomarker.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to placebo or 200 or 400 mg twice per day of sorafenib. DCE-MRI was performed at baseline and 4 weeks. DCE-MRI parameters, area under the contrast concentration versus time curve 90 seconds after contrast injection (IAUC(90)), and volume transfer constant of contrast agent (K-trans) were calculated for a metastatic site selected in a blinded manner. Primary end point was change in K-trans.ResultsOf the 56 assessable patients, 48 underwent two MRIs; 44 MRIs were assessable for study end points. Mean K-trans log ratios were 0.131 (standard deviation [SD], 0.315), -0.148 (SD, 0.382),-0.271 (SD, 0.499) in placebo, 200-and 400-mg cohorts, respectively (P = .0077 for trend) corresponding to changes of = 14%,-14%, and-24%. IAUC(90) log ratios were 0.041 (SD, 0.197), -0.040 (SD, 0.132), -0.356 (SD, 0.411), respectively (P = .0003 for trend), corresponding to changes of + 4%, -4%, and -30%. Using a log-rank test, IAUC(90) and K-trans changes were not associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with high baseline K-trans had a better PFS (P = .027).ConclusionIAUC(90) and K-trans are pharmacodynamic biomarkers for sorafenib, but variability is high and magnitude of effect is less than previously reported. Changes in DCE-MRI parameters after 4 weeks of sorafenib are not predictive of PFS, suggesting that these biomarkers are not surrogate end points. The value of baseline K-trans as a prognostic or predictive biomarker requires additional study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?