Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

[The Influence of Implantal Autograft Bone in Total Cleft Palate on Maxillary Growth an Experiment Study in Dogs].

The effect of artificial bone implantation in cleft palate on the development of maxilla]

Application of three dimensional model in evaluating the effect of artificial bone implantation of hard cleft palate on the development of maxilla

[A Primary Clinical Analysis of Artificial Bone Implantation of Cleft Palate].

Mechanical Tension-Stress in Alveolar Cleft Repaired With Autogenous Bone in Canine Models

Autogenous Iliac Bone Grafts in the Restoration of Cleft Alveolus in Dogs

Cephalometrical Analysis of Effects of Premaxillary Orthopedic Treatmenton Maxillary Growth of Wistar Rats with Bilateral Artificial Cleft Palate

Distraction osteogenesis for correction of cleft palate: establishment of the experimental animal model

Bone grafting, corticotomy, and orthodontics: treatment of cleft alveolus in a chinese cohort.

Evaluation of Osteogenic Efficiency of an Inorganic Ceramic Material for Repair of Canine Alveolar Clefts

Three-dimensional CT measurement for influence of complete bone defect in hard palate on maxillary bone growth and development in young lambs

The Influence of the Osteogenesis in Cleft Palate after Palatal Surgery to the Transverse Growth of Dental Occlusion

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

An Experimental Study on Tissue-Engineered Approach for the Repair of Bony Defect in Cleft Palate: a Lamb Model

Effects of hard‐ and/or soft‐tissue grafting with early implant placement: Histomorphometric outcomes of an exploratory study in canines

Bone Regeneration with Bilayer Bone Augmentation Technique for the Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Defects Around Implants: A Preliminary Study in Dogs

Biomechanics of craniofacial skeleton with cleft lip and palate on maxillary protraction: three-dimensional finite element analysis

Biomechanical Effects on Maxillary Protraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton with Cleft Lip and Palate after Alveolar Bone Graft.

Timing of Force Application on Buccal Tooth Movement into Bone-Grafted Alveolar Defects: A Pilot Study in Dogs.

Anteroposterior Development of Maxilla in 25 Adults with Unoperated Cleft Palate

Effects of implant placement timing and type of soft‐tissue grafting on histological and histomorphometric outcomes in a preclinical canine model