Abstract:There has been a large literature in the last two decades affirming adaptive DNA sequence evolution between species. The main lines of evidence are from (i) the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test, which compares divergence and polymorphism data, and (ii) the phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) test, which analyzes multispecies divergence data. Here, we apply these two tests concurrently to genomic data of Drosophila and Arabidopsis. To our surprise, the >100 genes identified by the two tests do not overlap beyond random expectation. Because the non-concordance could be due to low powers leading to high false negatives, we merge every 20-30 genes into a 'supergene'. At the supergene level, the power of detection is large but the calls still do not overlap. We rule out methodological reasons for the non-concordance. In particular, extensive simulations fail to find scenarios whereby positive selection can only be detected by either MK or PAML, but not both. Since molecular evolution is governed by positive and negative selection concurrently, a fundamental assumption for estimating one of these (say, positive selection) is that the other is constant. However, in a broad survey of primates, birds, Drosophila and Arabidopsis, we found that negative selection rarely stays constant for long in evolution. As a consequence, the variation in negative selection is often misconstrued as a signal of positive selection. In conclusion, MK, PAML and any method that examines genomic sequence evolution has to explicitly address the variation in negative selection before estimating positive selection. In a companion study, we propose a possible path forward in two stages-first, by mapping out the changes in negative selection and then using this map to estimate positive selection. For now, the large literature on positive selection between species has to await reassessment. The total evidence for natural selection at the DNA level in the last two decades is suspect.

Evidence for positive selection on a number of MicroRNA regulatory interactions during recent human evolution.

Evolution of the Human-Specific Microrna Mir-941

MicroRNA Expression and Regulation in Human, Chimpanzee, and Macaque Brains

SNP analysis reveals an evolutionary acceleration of the human-specific microRNAs

Impact of microRNA regulation on variation in human gene expression.

MicroRNA-Driven Developmental Remodeling in the Brain Distinguishes Humans from Other Primates

Conservation of gene order in human microRNA-neighboring regions.

Recent positive selection signatures reveal phenotypic evolution in the Han Chinese population

Systematic Analysis of Human Microrna Divergence Based on Evolutionary Emergence.

Genome wide signals of pervasive positive selection in human evolution

Two Decades of Suspect Evidence for Adaptive Molecular Evolution-Negative Selection Confounding Positive-Selection Signals

Evidence for the Association of Chromatin and Microrna Regulation in the Human Genome.

Molecular Population Genetics of Human CYP3A Locus: Signatures of Positive Selection and Implications for Evolutionary Environmental Medicine.

Molecular Evolution of A Primate-Specific Microrna Family

Genetic Evidence for the Convergent Evolution of Light Skin in Europeans and East Asians

Evidence for adaptive selection acting on the tRNA and rRNA genes of human mitochondrial DNA

Evidence of Purifying Selection and Co-Evolution at the Fold-Back Arm of the Novel Precursor MicroRNA159 Gene in Phalaenopsis Species (Orchidaceae)

Two decades of suspect evidence for adaptive DNA-sequence evolution – Less negative selection misconstrued as positive selection

Rapid Evolution of an X-linked Microrna Cluster in Primates.

A micro-RNA is the effector gene of a classic evolutionary hotspot locus

New Micrornas In Drosophila-Birth, Death And Cycles Of Adaptive Evolution