Calculations of the Effects of Methyl Groups on the Energy Differences Between Cyclooctatetraene and Bicyclo[4.2.0]octa-2,4,7-triene and Between Their Iron Tricarbonyl Complexes

Xiaoguang Bao,David A. Hrovat,Weston Thatcher Borden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jo202157n

2012-01-01

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Abstract:In accord with experiment, DFT calculations find that cyclooctatetraene (COT, 1a) is lower in energy than its valence isomer, bicyclo[4.2.0]octa-2,4,7-triene (BCOT, 3a) and that the iron tricarbonyl complex of COT [COT-Fe(CO)(3), 2a] is lower in energy than the iron tricarbonyl complex of BCOT [BCOT-Fe(CO)(3), 4a]. Also in agreement with experiment are the DFT findings that 1,3,5,7-tetramethylCOT (TMCOT, 1b) is lower in energy than 1,3,5,7-tetramethylBCOT (TMBCOT, 3b), but that the iron tricarbonyl complex of TMCOT [TMCOT-Fe(CO)(3), 2b] is higher in energy than the iron tricarbonyl complex of TMBCOT [TMBCOT-Fe(CO)(3), 4b]. Calculations of the energies of isodesmic reactions allow the effect of each of the four methyl groups in 1b-4b to be analyzed in terms of its additive contribution to the relative energies of TMCOT (1b) and TMBCOT (3b) and to the Fe(CO)(3) binding energies in TMCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (2b) and TMBCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (4b). Our calculations also predict that the eight methyl groups in octamethylCOT-Fe(CO)(3) [OMCOT-Fe(CO)(3), 2c] should have much more than twice the effect of the four methyl groups in TMCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (2b) on raising the energy of OMCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (2c), relative to that of OMBCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (4c). The effects of the interactions between the methyl groups in OMCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (2c) and OMBCOT-Fe(CO)(3) (4c) are dissected and discussed.