Prospective Associations of Dietary Insulin Demand, Glycemic Index, and Glycemic Load During Puberty with Body Composition in Young Adulthood

G Joslowski,J Goletzke,G Cheng,A L B Günther,J Bao,J C Brand-Miller,A E Buyken
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.241
2012-01-01
International Journal of Obesity
Abstract:Background: Puberty is a so-called critical period for overweight development and is characterized by physiological insulin resistance during mid-puberty. This study addressed the hypothesis that habitual consumption of a diet inducing higher levels of postprandial glycemia or insulinemia during puberty may have an unfavorable effect on the body composition in young adulthood. Methods: Multivariate regression analysis was performed on 262 participants of the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study with at least two 3-day weighed dietary records during puberty (baseline: girls 9–14 years; boys 10–15 years) and anthropometric measurements in young adulthood (18–25 years). A published dietary glycemic index was assigned to each carbohydrate-containing food. Similarly, each food was assigned a food insulin index (insulinemic response to a 1 MJ portion of food relative to 1 MJ of glucose) using 121 values measured at Sydney University. Results: Dietary glycemic index or glycemic load during puberty was not related to body composition in young adulthood. In contrast, a higher dietary insulin index and a higher dietary insulin load during puberty were associated with higher levels of percentage of body fat (%BF) in young adulthood, even after adjustment for early life, socioeconomic and nutritional factors; %BF in energy-adjusted tertiles of dietary insulin index were 22.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 21.6, 24.1), 24.5 (23.2, 25.7), 24.7 (23.5, 25.9) %, P for trend =0.01; %BF in energy-adjusted tertiles of dietary insulin load were 22.8 (95% CI: 21.5, 24.0), 24.5 (23.2, 25.7), 24.8 (23.6, 26.0) %, P for trend =0.01. Adjustment for baseline %BF attenuated these relationships ( P for trend =0.1 and=0.08, respectively). Dietary insulin demand was not related to body mass index. Conclusion: This study suggests a prospective adverse influence of dietary insulin demand during puberty on %BF in young adulthood. Postprandial increases in insulinemia rather than increases in glycemia appear to be implicated in an unfavorable development of body composition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?