Abstract:Background Limiting the marginal bone loss is a prerequisite for long-term stability of implants. Previous studies have evaluated the factors affecting marginal bone loss, including the mucous thickness, the depth of placement. The biologic width will form when the implants are uncovered, which unvaryingly exposes the bone around the implant neck to the oral cavity and starts bone loss, and the biologic width is formed by dissected mucous and the depth of placement of implant at initial stage. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of the mucous thickness, the depth of placement and the initial biologic width on the marginal bone loss. Material and Methods The clinical and radiographic data of 181 delayed-loaded Ankylos Implants in 140 patients were collected after 1–5 years follow-up. The radiographic examination was taken after implant placement, before the second stage surgery, and after 1–5 years follow-up. The mucous thickness, the depth of placement and crestal bone loss were calculated medially and distally. The initial biologic width was defined as either the thickness of the mucous when the implant was positioned supracrestally, or the sum of the thickness of the mucous and the depth of the implant when the implant was placed below the bone level. Implants were divided into 3 groups based on the initial biologic width, Group A (width less than 3 mm, include 3 mm), Group B (between 3 mm and 4 mm, include 4 mm), and Group C (width more than 4 mm). Significance was set to 0.05. Results Implants in Group A had 0.4(0.1.0) mm bone loss mesially and 0.3(0.0.8) mm distally. For Group B, the bone loss values were m- 0.3(0.0.8) mm and d- 0.3(0.0.7) mm. Group C implants experienced bone loss of m- 0.7(0.2.1.1) mm and d- 0.6(0.1.1.0) mm. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to find differences between groups. There was significant difference between groups (P = 0.011). Kruskal-Wallis test for implants placed below, at, or above the bone level yielded a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). The calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient between the mucous thickness and the marginal bone loss shows negative correlation (rs=−0.243, P = 0.001), while the depth of placement and the marginal bone loss show the positive correlation (rs=0.477, P = 0.000). Conclusions and Clinical Implications The crestal bone loss was found to be the positively correlated to the depth of placement and had negative correlated to the mucous thickness. The result may suggest that the closer the initial biologic width is to the final biologic width, the less bone loss is, and if the initial biologic width is not adequate, bone loss may occur to ensure the proper development of biologic width.

Peri-implant Mucosal Inflammation and Bone Loss: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of 108 Dental Implants after 1-Year Loading.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of 108 Dental Implants after 1-Year Loading

The Occurrence of Peri-Implant Mucositis Associated with the Shift of Submucosal Microbiome in Patients with a History of Periodontitis During the First Two Years.

Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

A One- Year Study on Peri- Implant Status of Osseointegrated Dental Implants

The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

Investigation of early marginal bone resorption of different implants in posterior-tooth areas and its influencing factors

Patient-, implant- and prosthetic-related factors on peri-implant mucositis and bone loss

A cross-sectional study for prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Analysis of risk indicators for implant failure in patients with chronic periodontitis

Study on Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Peri-implant Disease

Peri-implant conditions and their relationship with periodontal conditions in Chinese patients: a cross-sectional study.

Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

Clinical Observation on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Around Bone Level Implants and Tissue Level Im-Plants in Posterior Region

[A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effect of Implant Restoration Following Micro Crestal Flap-Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sockets with Severe Periodontitis].

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Locking-Taper Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A 12-Year Retrospective Study.

Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study

Influencing Factors Regarding the Severity of Peri-Implantitis and Peri-Implant Mucositis

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Combined Surgery Approach to Treat Peri-Implantitis.

Clinical, microbiological, and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study