Pyoderma Gangrenosum of Abdominal Wall: a Case Report.

Imtiaz Wani,Irfan Hussain Gowher Bhat,Mushtaq Mir,Mudasir Mir,Naveed Hassan,Ajaz Mustafa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2011.18
2011-01-01
Oman Medical Journal
Abstract:Pyoderma gangrenosum is an ulcerative disease of skin, the etiology of which is obscure. The authors are reporting a case of pyoderma gangrenosum of the abdominal wall that was initially misdiagnosed as a parietal wall abscess and exhibited characteristic pathergy after drainage. Diagnosis was made on clinical grounds and by the presence of pathergy. Abdominal wall pyoderma gangrenosum should be suspected in any patient with non-healing ulcerative lesions of the abdominal wall. The patient responded well to steroids with no recurrence seen in the follow up period. Pyoderma gangrenosum, a nuetrophilic dermatosis, is a rare ulcerative cutaneous disease. An immunological abnormality has been proposed as a possible mechanism. There are no specific clinical features seen with this disease. This has characteristic features of pathergy. Diagnosis relies on excluding other causes of ulcerative skin diseases. The occurrence of pyoderma gangrenosum at a surgical site is rare especially if there is no predisposing illness. Early diagnosis is essential to prevent pathergy. Corticosteroids are the main drugs used for treatment. A 28 year old female presented with painful swelling of the right abdominal wall and fever of 5 days duration for which she had received antibiotics but had no relief, with the worsening of symptoms and progressive increase of the swelling. On general physical examination, the patient had a dehydrated look and fever of 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Systemic examination was normal. Local examination revealed a tender swelling measuring 10 × 7.8 × 2.3 centimeter showing fluctuation, free from underlying structures, with prominence on Carnett’s test’s (leg raising test) in the right lower abdomen and was diagnosed as right parietal wall abscess, and had an incision and drainage. Thirty-six hours after incision and drainage, and despite improvement, there was an ulcer with pus and development of another pustule, and so the patient underwent another debridement. There was seen further worsening of symptoms despite the patient being on broad spectrum antibiotics, and the drainage of abscess were no improvement and the patient developed a third ulcerated lesion adjacent to the previous ones. The ulcers had a dirty floor with asymmetrical borders (Fig.1). Histopathological examination identified a non-specific mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate with
What problem does this paper attempt to address?