Abstract:Abstract Cell signal networks are orchestrated directly or indirectly by various peptide-mediated protein–protein interactions, which are normally weak and transient and thus ideal for biological regulation and medicinal intervention. Here, we develop a general-purpose method for modeling and predicting the binding affinities of protein–peptide interactions (PpIs) at the structural level. The method is a hybrid strategy that employs an unsupervised approach to derive a layered PpI atom–residue interaction (ulPpI[a-r]) potential between different protein atom types and peptide residue types from thousands of solved PpI complex structures and then statistically correlates the potential descriptors with experimental affinities (KD values) over hundreds of known PpI samples in a supervised manner to create an integrated unsupervised–supervised PpI affinity (usPpIA) predictor. Although both the ulPpI[a-r] potential and usPpIA predictor can be used to calculate PpI affinities from their complex structures, the latter seems to perform much better than the former, suggesting that the unsupervised potential can be improved substantially with a further correction by supervised statistical learning. We examine the robustness and fault-tolerance of usPpIA predictor when applied to treat the coarse-grained PpI complex structures modeled computationally by sophisticated peptide docking and dynamics simulation. It is revealed that, despite developed solely based on solved structures, the integrated unsupervised–supervised method is also applicable for locally docked structures to reach a quantitative prediction but can only give a qualitative prediction on globally docked structures. The dynamics refinement seems not to change (or improve) the predictive results essentially, although it is computationally expensive and time-consuming relative to peptide docking. We also perform extrapolation of usPpIA predictor to the indirect affinity quantities of HLA-A*0201 binding epitope peptides and NHERF PDZ binding scaffold peptides, consequently resulting in a good and moderate correlation of the predicted KD with experimental IC50 and BLU on the two peptide sets, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients Rp = 0.635 and 0.406, respectively.

Proteome-wide Detection of Abl1 SH3-binding Peptides by Integrating Computational Prediction and Peptide Microarray

Computational Analysis and Prediction of the Binding Motif and Protein Interacting Partners of the Abl SH3 Domain

Prediction of Binding Sites of Peptide Recognition Domains: An Application on Grb2 and SAP SH2 Domains

Characterization of Domain-Peptide Interaction Interface: A Generic Structure-based Model to Decipher the Binding Specificity of SH3 Domains

Exploring the Binding Mechanism Between Human Profilin (PFN1) and Polyproline-10 Through Binding Mode Screening

A High-Throughput Percentage-of-binding Strategy to Measure Binding Energies in DNA-protein Interactions: Application to Genome-Scale Site Discovery.

A single-chain antibody/epitope system for functional analysis of protein-protein interactions

Characterization of Domain-Peptide Interaction Interface: Prediction of Sh3 Domain-Mediated Protein-Protein Interaction Network in Yeast by Generic Structure-Based Models

High-throughput profiling of sequence recognition by tyrosine kinases and SH2 domains using bacterial peptide display

A high efficiency strategy for binding property characterization of peptide-binding domains

Predicting protein-peptide interaction sites using distant protein complexes as structural templates

Predicting physiologically relevant SH3 domain mediated protein–protein interactions in yeast

Prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using homology modeling, molecular dynamics and molecular field analysis.

A Computational Pipeline for Accurate Prioritization of Protein‐Protein Binding Candidates in High‐Throughput Protein Libraries

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Prediction of Peptides Binding to the PKA RIIα Subunit Using a Hierarchical Strategy

Sifting Through the Noise: A Computational Pipeline for Accurate Prioritization of Protein-Protein Binding Candidates in High-Throughput Protein Libraries

Advancing Protein-DNA Binding Site Prediction: Integrating Sequence Models and Machine Learning Classifiers

Identifying The Proteins To Which Small-Molecule Probes And Drugs Bind In Cells

Reexamination of the Recognition Preference of the Specificity Pocket of the Abl SH3 Domain

Application of Twin‐Strep Tagging and TurboID Proximity Labeling in Discovery of Microprotein‐protein Interactions