Abstract:Various lines of defense against infection are present in all living creatures. The balance between symbiosis and parasitism is determined by the mechanisms through which the host resists infection and by the extent of injury induced by the parasite: both factors contribute to disease. Lines of host defense can be arbitrarily divided into three components: 1) barrier functions of skin and mucous membranes and their innate physical and secretory antimicrobial components; 2) elements of host defense that do not necessarily require prior exposure to an infectious agent or immunologic memory (mast cells, granulocytes, macrophages, NK cells, gamma/delta T cells); and 3) immune responses directed against specific epitopes on the infectious agent induced by prior exposure and immunologic memory (alpha/beta T cells, B cells). Analysis of such host defense mechanisms repeatedly documents tremendous redundancy and overlap between these lines of defense. Further, there is open communication, so that a change at any one level ripples throughout the system. Acquired nonspecific resistance to infection is an example of such a ripple. Host response to one infection alerts the immune system, so that the general level of resistance to other infectious agents is increased. This response is initiated by an immune response (third line of defense) but effected by nonspecific elements (second line of defense). The survival value of such responses is obvious. There are numerous examples in both mouse and man of the operation of these systems in response to infection. Further, the menus of antimicrobial components available to both mouse and man for resistance to infection are very similar, but not identical. Indeed, it is said that the genetic basis for differences between mice and man revolve around a difference of less than 10% in DNA sequences. But there are differences! Mouse macrophages produce IFN-beta in response to infection, human cells produce IFN-alpha. Mouse macrophages effect antimicrobial activity principally through induction of NO synthase and the generation of toxic nitrogen oxides. This pathway has yet to be described with human macrophages. In both man and mouse, F. tularensis is an obligate intracellular parasite of macrophages that requires an essential component provided by the cell for its replication. That mouse and man are not so different is well illustrated by the effector mechanisms induced by IFN-gamma for antimicrobial activity against F. tularensis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Macrophage antimycobacterial mechanisms.

Activation of macrophages for antimycobacterial activity

Killing of Mycobacterium Microti by Immunologically Activated Macrophages

Antimycobacterial Effect of Lysates Prepared from Immunologically Activated Macrophages

Release of Superoxide and Hydrogen Peroxide from Guinea-Pig Alveolar Macrophages During Phagocytosis of Mycobacterium Bovis BCG

The Macrophage and Mycobacterial Infections.

Intelligent Mechanisms of Macrophage Apoptosis Subversion by Mycobacterium

Mycobacterium tuberculosis-macrophage interaction: Molecular updates

Effector molecules of the host defence mechanism against Mycobacterium avium complex: the evidence showing that reactive oxygen intermediates, reactive nitrogen intermediates, and free fatty acids each alone are not decisive in expression of macrophage antimicrobial activity against the parasites

Mycobacterium-Microti May Protect Itself From Intracellular Destruction By Releasing Cyclic-Amp Into Phagosomes

Virulent Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis subverts macrophages during early stages of infection

A Potential Target Gene for the Host-Directed Therapy of Mycobacterial Infection in Murine Macrophages.

Phagosome-Lysosome Fusion and Cyclic Adenosine 3'-5'-monophosphate in Macrophages Infected with Mycobacterium-Microti, Mycobacterium-Bovis Bcg or Mycobacterium-Lepraemurium

Insights into battles between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and macrophages

Activation of Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages by Maintenance in Serum-Free Medium.

The Interaction Between Mycobaterium Tuberculosis and Macrophages

Subversion of Macrophage Functions by Bacterial Protein Toxins and Effectors

Virulence of Mycobacterium-Tuberculosis and Susceptibility to Peroxidative Killing Systems

Macrophage activation: a riddle of immunological resistance

Human Macrophages Activate Bystander Neutrophils' Metabolism and Effector Functions When Challenged with Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Macrophages exploit the mannose receptor and JAK-STAT1-MHC-II pathway to drive antigen presentation and the antimycobacterial immune response after BCG vaccination