Chemistries for Patterning Robust DNA MicroBarcodes Enable Multiplex Assays of Cytoplasm Proteins from Single Cancer Cells
Young Shik Shin,Habib Ahmad,Qihui Shi,Hyungjun Kim,Tod A. Pascal,Rong Fan,William A. Goddard,James R. Heath
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000528
IF: 3.52
2010-01-01
ChemPhysChem
Abstract:The optimization of chemistries to enable the patterning of miniaturized DNA barcodes using microfluidics flow channels is described (see picture). Experiment and theory reveal that solvent mixtures in which counterions are strongly associated with the negatively charged DNA oligomers may be harnessed to produce high quality, high density DNA microarray patterns over a large area. The demand for parallel, multiplex analysis of protein biomarkers from ever smaller biospecimens is an increasing trend for both fundamental biology and clinical diagnostics.1–3 The most highly multiplex protein assays rely on spatially encoded antibody microarrays,4–6 and small biospecimens samples are now routinely manipulated using microfluidics approaches. The integration of antibody microarray techniques with microfluidics chips has only been explored relatively recently. One challenge arises from the relative instability of antibodies to microfluidics fabrication conditions. In recent years, several groups have devised methods to transform standard DNA microarrays in situ into protein microarrays and cell-capture platforms.7–13 These approaches capitalize on the chemical robustness of DNA oligomers, and the reliable assembly of DNA-labeled structures via complementary hybridization. Recently, Fan et al. utilized a microfluidics-based flow patterning technique to generate DNA barcode-type arrays at 10× higher density than standard, spotted microarrays.14 The DNA barcodes were converted into antibody arrays using the DNA-encoded antibody library (DEAL) technique, and then applied towards the measurement of a highly multiplex panel of proteins from a pinprick of whole blood. A second challenge involves scaling such miniaturized DNA microarrays so that a large surface area can be encoded. This problem is non-trivial, as it involves identifying chemistries for patterning 10−5 m wide, 1 m long strips of biomolecules with a uniformity that permits those patterns to be utilized in hundreds to thousands of quantitative protein assays per chip. Herein, we explore the surface chemistry associated with microfluidics-based flow patterning of DNA barcodes, with an eye towards producing highly reproducible and robust barcodes. We then apply the optimized chemistry towards assaying a panel of cytoplasmic proteins from single cells. We explore three different flow patterning surface chemistries: two rely upon the electrostatic adsorption of DNA onto a poly-L-lysine (PLL) surface, and the third utilizes flow patterning of dendrimers onto aminated glass substrates, followed by covalent attachment of DNA oligomers onto the dendrimer scaffolds. For the electrostatic adsorption cases, we investigate, using both theory and experiment, the role that counterions play in flow patterning within the confined dimensions of a microfluidic channel, and we find that solvent mixtures which associate counterions more strongly to the negatively charged DNA oligomers yield more reproducible and robust barcodes. We then demonstrate the utility of the best flow patterning chemistry by combining it with DEAL to construct antibody barcodes for quantitatively assaying a panel of phosphorylated proteins, associated with oncogenic pathways, from single cells that are representative of the brain cancer glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The microfluidics flow patterning chip is comprised of a patterned polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) layer adhered to an aminated or PLL-coated glass substrate that provides the base surface for the microchannels. The microchannels are long (about 55 cm), meandering channels that span ca. 0.85 cm2 of our substrate, and are used to pattern a DNA barcode over most of the glass surface (Figure 1 b). After the flow patterning is completed, the PDMS layer is replaced with a second micropatterned PDMS layer that is designed to support a biological assay, such as the previously reported blood proteomics chip,14 or the single-cell proteomics chips utilized herein. For the microfluidic patterning method to be useful, it must generate a DNA barcode that exhibits high and uniform DNA loading over the entire substrate. We evaluated the patterning chemistries illustrated in Figure 1 a, Schemes 1–3. Schemes 1 and 2 are drawn from the conventional protocol for pin-spotted microarrays—a solution containing the DNA is introduced, the solvent is evaporated, and subsequent thermal or UV treatment is employed to cross-link the deposited DNA to the substrate. In Scheme 1 ssDNA oligomers dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) are utilized, whereas in Scheme 2 ssDNAs in a 1:1 mixture of 1×PBS and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) are employed. DMSO is used in conventional microarray preparation to improve feature consistency by reducing the rate of solvent evaporation and by denaturing the DNA15 although, as described below, its role in this process is different. In Scheme 3 a covalent immobilization method based upon a dendrimer scaffold is utilized.16 Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers (generation 4.5, carboxylate surface) have previously shown promise as DNA and protein microarray substrates. Dendrimers do not form entangled chains17 and because harsh crosslinking procedures are avoided, dendrimer-immobilized DNA retains high accessibility and activity in microarray applications. Moreover, the highly branched structure of the dendrimers provides a high density of reactive sites for surface attachment and for DNA coupling, thus leading to a high overall binding capacity. For all cases, a high level of DNA loading has been shown to decrease non-specific binding when compared to standard microarray substrates.11, 18–20 a) Surface treatment schemes. b) Design of the DNA patterning device (top) and fluorescence image of DNAs filled into the channel (still in solution). Outer five channels are filled with DNAs in 1:1 mixture of PBS and water (Scheme 1 ). The five inner are filled with DNA in a 1:1 mixture of PBS and DMSO (Scheme 2 ). Three channels in between are left empty for visualization. c) Fluorescence images of patterned DNAs by three schemes. Figure 1 b (top) shows the PDMS chip design used for barcode patterning. Thirteen discrete channels (for a thirteen-element barcode) allow for a multiplex microarray. We loaded five adjacent channels according to Scheme 1, skipped three channels, and then loaded the remaining five channels according to Scheme 2. The use of fluorescently-tagged DNA permitted measurements of the DNA distribution within each individual channel immediately after introducing the solutions. Figure 1 b demonstrates a clear difference in aqueous DNA distribution across the chip: DNA loaded according to Scheme 1 (outer five channels) is notably lower in concentration near the middle of the chip (Figure 1 b, Region 2) and is barely detectable near the channel exit (Figure 1 b, Region 1). Conversely, DNA loaded according to Scheme 2 (inner five channels) presents an even, consistent distribution across the entire chip. Notably, Scheme 1 yields a relatively higher fluorescence intensity at the input side of the chip. These results clearly indicate that, for Scheme 1, the ssDNA oligomers are accumulating upstream during the early stages of flow, and so are depleted from the advancing solution by the time it reaches mid-chip. The actual patterning of the glass substrate occurs when solvent is evaporated (Figure S2, Supportiing Information). Indeed, the final patterning results after solvent evaporation and cross-linking (Figure 1 c, top) reflect the trend established by the aqueous fluorescence images; Scheme 2 produces uniform DNA barcodes across the substrate, while Scheme 1 does not. Line profiles corresponding to Figure 1 c can be found in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). In order to understand the difference in patterning uniformity between Schemes 1 and 2, we considered the electrostatic environment for each case. As depicted in Figure 2 a, the PDMS side walls carry a slightly negative zeta potential, whereas the PLL surface has a strong positive zeta potential.21 When the ssDNA solution in Scheme 1 is introduced to the channel, ssDNA near the PLL matrix is electrostatically immobilized, thereby generating a concentration gradient.22 As the solution flows towards the channel exit, the ssDNA oligomers are continually depleted via deposition onto the PLL surface. Figure 2 b shows the results from a rough simulation designed to capture the mean concentration of aqueous ssDNA as the solution traverses a channel. The simulation implies that the effect of electrostatic adsorption proves dominant even at high DNA concentrations, a result that agrees well with the observed behavior for Scheme 1 in Figure 1 b. A detailed description of the model and assumptions employed can be found in the Supporting Information. We tested this model via the strong negative charging of all four channel surfaces via O2 plasma treatment. Consistent with the model, both Schemes 1 and 2 exhibited equivalently uniform distribution of fluorescence intensity across the chip (Figure S3 b, Supporting Information). We note that lack of the positive charges on the bottom surface failed to hold DNAs during the drying procedure and that the plasma treatment induces the irreversible bonding of PDMS and glass, which limits further use beyond this experimental test. Electrostatic adsorption of DNAs on PLL surface and DMSO effect. a) The filling step. b) Simulation result of electrostatic adsorption of DNAs to PLL surface. c) Molecular simulation of the DMSO effect: the radial distribution function of P atom of the phosphate group and the sodium ions. The presence of DMSO pumps sodium ions from the 2nd shell to the 1st shell (arrow). d) Schematics for DMSO effect. Green circles represent sodium ions. The results from Schemes 1 and 2 imply that DMSO alleviates the electrostatic adsorption effect. In order to understand this more fully, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA in PBS and PBS/DMSO solutions; 3 ns of NPT [NPT is a simulation in which number of moles (N), pressure (P) and temperature (T) are held constant]. The MD simulations were performed with the last 1 ns trajectory used for analysis. We examined the radial distribution function of phosphorous atoms in the DNA backbone with respect to various elements of the surrounding solvent. For example, the radial distribution function of P and the O atom of a water molecule is virtually unperturbed by the addition of DMSO (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Consequently, it is unsurprising that the radial distribution function of P and the S atom of DMSO (Figure 2 c, black solid line) reveals that DMSO is not forming a solvation structure with the DNA backbone. However, Figure 2 c demonstrates a clear interaction between P and Na+ ions, which delineates into two well-defined shell structures: the first is located at r<4.3 Å while the second is located at 4.3 Å