Abstract:High resolution proteomics approaches have been successfully utilized for the comprehensive characterization of the cell proteome. However, in the case of quantitative proteomics an open question still remains, which quantification strategy is best suited for identification of biologically relevant changes, especially in clinical specimens. In this study, a thorough comparison of a label-free approach (intensity-based) and 8-plex iTRAQ was conducted as applied to the analysis of tumor tissue samples from non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For the latter, two acquisition strategies were tested including analysis of unfractionated and fractioned iTRAQ-labeled peptides. To reduce variability, aliquots of the same protein extract were used as starting material, whereas to obtain representative results per method further sample processing and MS analysis were conducted according to routinely applied protocols. Considering only multiple-peptide identifications, LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 910, 1092 and 332 proteins by label-free, fractionated and unfractionated iTRAQ, respectively. The label-free strategy provided higher protein sequence coverage compared to both iTRAQ experiments. Even though pre-fraction of the iTRAQ labeled peptides allowed for a higher number of identifications, this was not accompanied by a respective increase in the number of differentially expressed changes detected. Validity of the proteomics output related to protein identification and differential expression was determined by comparison to existing data in the field (Protein Atlas and published data on the disease). All methods predicted changes which to a large extent agreed with published data, with label-free providing a higher number of significant changes than iTRAQ. Conclusively, both label-free and iTRAQ (when combined to peptide fractionation) provide high proteome coverage and apparently valid predictions in terms of differential expression, nevertheless label-free provides higher sequence coverage and ultimately detects a higher number of differentially expressed proteins. The risk for receiving false associations still exists, particularly when analyzing highly heterogeneous biological samples, raising the need for the analysis of higher sample numbers and/or application of adjustment for multiple testing.

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis to Profile Dynamic Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Cellular Proteins.

Differently Tagged Probes for Protein Profiling of Mitochondria

Evolution of organelle-associated protein profiling

Improved sub-cellular resolution via simultaneous analysis of organelle proteomics data across varied experimental conditions

A fully automated system with online sample loading, isotope dimethyl labeling and multidimensional separation for high-throughput quantitative proteome analysis.

Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomic Profiling

Molecular profiling of single organelles for quantitative analysis of cellular heterogeneity

Ultra-high Sensitivity Mass Spectrometry Quantifies Single-Cell Proteome Changes Upon Perturbation

Quantitative Analysis of the Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Proteins Using ER-Localizable Reactive Molecules

Spatial-proteomics reveals phospho-signaling dynamics at subcellular resolution

Quantitation and localization of protein molecules in living cells

Spatial-proteomics reveal in-vivo phospho-signaling dynamics at subcellular resolution

Cover Feature: Differently Tagged Probes for Protein Profiling of Mitochondria (chembiochem 9/2019)

Proteomic Mapping of Mitochondria in Living Cells Via Spatially Restricted Enzymatic Tagging

Isobaric Tagging and Data Independent Acquisition as Complementary Strategies for Proteome Profiling on an Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer

Deep and fast label-free Dynamic Organellar Mapping

Comparative Analysis of Label-Free and 8-Plex iTRAQ Approach for Quantitative Tissue Proteomic Analysis

Cross-link assisted spatial proteomics to map sub-organelle proteomes and membrane protein topologies

Spatiotemporal Profiling of Cytosolic Signaling Complexes in Living Cells by Selective Proximity Proteomics.

Label-Free Protein Quantification Using Lc-Coupled Ion Trap or Ft Mass Spectrometry: Reproducibility, Linearity, and Application with Complex Proteomes

Toward Analysis of Proteins in Single Cells: A Quantitative Approach Employing Isobaric Tags with MALDI Mass Spectrometry Realized with a Microfluidic Platform.