Visuo-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents.

Daniel Richard Leff,Julian Leong,Guang-Zhong Yang,Ara W Darzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.036

IF: 3.125

2008-01-01

The American Journal of Surgery

Abstract:We read with interest the article by Wanzel et al [[1]Wanzel K.R. Anastakis D.J. McAndrews M.P. et al.Visual-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents.Am J Surg. 2007; 193: 507-510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar] regarding the identification of specific cortical networks associated with mental rotation tasks (MRTs) in surgical residents. Using fMRI, the investigators demonstrated enhanced activation in certain cortical regions associated with improved MRT performance, and they suggest that this may have implications for surgery. The difficulties involved in extrapolating the results of visuospatial tests to technical skills in surgery were highlighted previously by the investigators themselves [[2]Anastakis D.J. Hamstra S.J. Matsumoto E.D. Visual-spatial abilities in surgical training.Am J Surg. 2000; 179: 469-471Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar]. Although the use of MRTs is justified on the basis of previous correlations with surgical performance [[3]Wanzel K.R. Hamstra S.J. Anastakis D.J. et al.Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills.Lancet. 2002; 359: 230-231Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (203) Google Scholar], the investigators failed to demonstrate good correlation with performance on temporally spaced MRTs. Moreover, no follow-up assessment of the Z-plasty procedure was conducted, despite a 12-month delay between the two investigations. As a result, it is impossible to know whether the cortical findings presented in this article have any relevance to surgery whatsoever. We do not dispute the potential that functional neuroimaging may have in advancing our understanding of expertise development in surgery. Rather, we believe that further research in this arena is warranted. Only by appreciating the manner in which skills are integrated by surgical novices at the cortical level, can we begin to understand why some trainees’ technical skills progress rapidly, whereas others struggle depsite similar training environments. However, our view is that cortical function must be evaluated during surgical tasks and not surrogate tasks. This begs the question of how to evaluate cortical function during surgery? A number of technical constraints would make evaluating surgical tasks in the fMRI environment challenging. These include signal distortion as a result of head motion; limitations on subjects’ visual fields to approximately 15° to 20°; and the confined space of the magnet bore, which often creates a sense of claustrophobia [[4]McIsaac H.K. Thordarson D.S. Shafran R. et al.Claustrophobia and the magnetic resonance imaging procedure.J Behav Med. 1998; 21: 255-268Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar]. In addition, the imaging equipment may generate considerable acoustic noise with gradient switching, and the subject may be required to wear earplugs or headphones [[5]Liener K. Wunderlich A. Ehret G. et al.Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging.Laryngorhinootologie. 2005; 84: 108-112Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar]. The participants would be located some distance from the investigators, limiting interactions and making observation of technical performance more difficult. Finally, it would be impossible to assess procedures (such as a Z-plasty) using metallic surgical instruments. As a result, we disagree with Wanzel et al [[1]Wanzel K.R. Anastakis D.J. McAndrews M.P. et al.Visual-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents.Am J Surg. 2007; 193: 507-510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar] that “fMRI may hold potential as a novel and objective method of monitoring learning in surgery.” In this regard, we have been investigating functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) as a modality for evaluating cortical correlates of technical skills in surgery [[6]Leff D.R. Koh P.H. Aggarwal R. et al.Optical mapping of the frontal cortex during a surgical knot-tying task: a feasibility study.Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2006; 4091: 140-147Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar]. Both fNIRS and fMRI can be considered as indirect neuroimaging tools because they both measure the haemodynamic response to brain activation rather than neuronal discharge itself. However, unlike fMRI, fNIRS is portable; allows a surgeon to be assessed in realistic settings; and has the potential to be used in the operating room. Moreover, fNIRS enables tasks requiring dynamic movements to be evaluated in “real time” and is considerably less expensive than fMRI. In a benchtop environment [[6]Leff D.R. Koh P.H. Aggarwal R. et al.Optical mapping of the frontal cortex during a surgical knot-tying task: a feasibility study.Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2006; 4091: 140-147Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar], we demonstrated a reliable signal trace from fNIRS during surgical knot tying and are currently evaluating the neuroplasticity that accompanies surgical learning. Visual–spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residentsThe American Journal of SurgeryVol. 193Issue 4PreviewWe previously reported that a particular type of visual–spatial ability, mental rotation of visual forms, correlates with surgical performance in residents. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify patterns of cortical activation associated with mental rotation ability in those same residents. Full-Text PDF