Abstract:Objectives We sought to prospectively evaluate risk of stroke and impact of transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients with permanent right-to left shunt compared with those with Valsalva maneuver-induced right-toleft shunt.Background Pathophysiology and properly management of PFO still remain far from being fully clarified: in particular, the contribution of permanent right-to-left shunt remains unknown.Methods Between March 2006 and October 2010, we enrolled 180 (mean age 44 +/- 10.9 years, 98 women) of 320 consecutive patients referred to our center for transcatheter PFO closure, who had spontaneous permanent right-toleft shunt on transcranial Doppler and transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography. All patients fulfilled the standard current indications for transcatheter closure and underwent preoperative transesophageal echocardiography and brain magnetic resonance imaging, with subsequent intracardiac echocardiographic-guided transcatheter PFO closure. We compared the clinical echocardiographic characteristics of these patients (Permanent Group) with the rest of 140 patients with right-to-left shunt only during Valsalva maneuver (Valsalva Group).Results Compared with the Valsalva Group patients, patients of the Permanent Group had increased frequency of multiple ischemic brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, previous recurrent stroke, previous peripheral arteries embolism, migraine with aura, and-more frequently-atrial septal aneurysm and prominent Eustachian valve. The presence of permanent shunt confers the highest risk of recurrent stroke (odds ratio: 5.9, 95% confidence interval: 2.0 to 12, p < 0.001). No differences were recorded between the 2 groups with regard to recurrence of ischemic events after the closure procedure.Conclusions Despite its small-sample nature, our study suggests that patients with permanent right-to-left shunt have potentially a higher risk of paradoxical embolism compared with those without. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2257-61) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Patent Foramen Ovale: the Evident Paradox Between the Apparently Simple Treatment and the Really Complex Pathophysiology

Patent Foramen Ovale: a Comprehensive Review for Pulmonologists

Transcatheters for Closure of Patent Foramen Ovales

Closing Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke: the Underscored Importance of Other Interatrial Shunt Variants

Asymptomatic Significant Patent Foramen Ovale: Giving Patent Foramen Ovale Management Back to the Cardiologist

Transcatheters for Closure of Patent Foramen Ovales.

Patent Foramen Ovale with Paradoxical Embolism: Mid‐Term Results of Transcatheter Closure in 256 Patients

[Patent Foramen Ovale: a Benign Anatomical Variant That Can Become a Disease].

Recent Advances in Catheter Devices for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Permanent Right-to-left Shunt is the Key Factor in Managing Patent Foramen Ovale.

Safety and Long-Term Results of Patent Foramen Ovale Transcatheter Closure in Patients with Thrombophilia.

Patent Foramen Ovale Management: Who Should Do What?

Patent Foramen Ovale-Mania: an Unusual Case of Misdiagnosis.

Residual Shunt after Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Preliminary Results from Italian Patent Foramen Ovale Survey

Patent Oval Foramen Transcatheter Closure: Results of A Strategy Based on Tailoring the Device to the Specific Patient'S Anatomy

Premere Occlusion System for Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Mid‐term Results of a Single‐center Registry

Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in spite of interatrial septum hypertrophy or lipomatosis: a case series.

Differences and Similarities in Interatrial Shunts Management.

Patent Foramen Ovale: The Unresolved Questions

Long-Term Outcomes and Complications of Intracardiac Echocardiography-Assisted Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in 1,000 Consecutive Patients.

Setting Up a Multidisciplinary Program for Management of Patent Foramen Ovale‐Mediated Syndromes