[The Effects of Enteral Nutrition Versus Total Parenteral Nutrition on Gut Barrier Function in Severe Acute Pancreatitis].

Chun-fang Xu,Xiao-xi Huang,Yun-zhi Shen,Xing-peng Wang,Lei Gong,Ya-dong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2011.05.004
2011-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on gut barrier function in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).METHODS:Sixty-three patients with SAP enrolled from 4 hospitals were randomly assigned into EN group (29 cases) and TPN group (34 cases). EN group patients were fed via a spiral nasojejunal feeding tube placed routinely by endoscopy or fluoroscopy, and TPN group patients were nourished intravenously with TPN during the same period. The changes of serum endotoxin, diamine oxidase, and urinary excretion of lactulose and mannitol ratio (L/M) were observed.RESULTS:Plasma concentration of endotoxin were markedly decreased in EN group as compared with that in TPN group at the 7(th), 14(th), 21(th) day of entry trial [(39.30 ± 15.82) EU/L vs (73.05 ± 21.16) EU/L, (22.64 ± 14.31) EU/L vs (49.34 ± 24.54) EU/L, (14.81 ± 10.93) EU/L vs (30.08 ± 14.10) EU/L, P < 0.05]. Plasma concentration of diamine oxidase were markedly decreased in EN group as compared with that in TPN group at the 7(th), 14(th) day of entry trial [(9.97 ± 3.84) U/L vs (19.89 ± 9.89) U/L, (5.42 ± 1.84) U/L vs (8.79 ± 4.08) U/L, both P < 0.05]. The urinary L/M decreased significantly in EN group than those in TPN group at the 7(th), 14(th), 21(th) day of entry trial (0.28 ± 0.25 vs 0.65 ± 0.45, 0.21 ± 0.18 vs 0.54 ± 0.41, 0.08 ± 0.04 vs 0.29 ± 0.06, all P < 0.05).CONCLUSION:EN has better effect on improving intestinal barrier function than TPN in treatment of patients with SAP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?