Vascular Remodeling in Diabetes
Anna Zampetaki,Qingbo Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.108.178137
2009-01-01
Abstract:HomeArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular BiologyVol. 29, No. 1Vascular Remodeling in Diabetes Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBVascular Remodeling in DiabetesDon’t Leave Without Your STAT5 Anna Zampetaki and Qingbo Xu Anna ZampetakiAnna Zampetaki From the Cardiovascular Division, King’s College London BHF Centre, London, UK. Search for more papers by this author and Qingbo XuQingbo Xu From the Cardiovascular Division, King’s College London BHF Centre, London, UK. Search for more papers by this author Originally published1 Jan 2009https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.178137Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:10–11Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. A widespread endothelial dysfunction, altered production of vasoactive substances and superoxide and modification of the basement membranes, is believed to play a decisive role in the vascular complications observed in diabetes.1 More importantly perhaps, in diabetic patients collateral vessel development after vascular occlusion is impaired. It seems that in these patients, arteriogenesis, the growing of preexisting arteriolar connections into collateral to restore the blood supply to the ischemic area, is severely affected.2,3 This process of active vascular remodeling involves the recruitment of circulating monocytes-macrophage subsets that have a strong angiogenic response. Although these circulating angiogenic cells (CAC) do not adopt a typical endothelial phenotype in vitro, they are capable of enhancing neovascularization in a paracrine manner in vivo and are critical regulators of wound healing and tissue regeneration.4 Extensive studies have shown that the numbers of circulating angiogenic cells are significantly lower in type II diabetes, and their angiogenic potential is also dramatically diminished. These cells display defective adhesion to the endothelium, reduced proliferation rate, and impaired ability to create new vascular structures.5–7 Thus, to pursue any therapeutic application it is necessary to identify the signaling pathways and treatments that promote the proliferation and improve the functional capacity of circulating angiogenic cells in diabetes.See accompanying article on page 114In this issue of Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Dentelli et al8 delineate the molecular mechanisms involved in interleukin (IL) 3–induced angiogenic cell expansion. Previous studies by the same group have revealed that this angiogenic mediator released by activated T cells can provide a permissive environment that enables angiogenic cells to expand and directly contribute to neovascularization.9 In their present work, they demonstrate that IL-3 induces the formation of a STAT5/PPARγ transcriptional complex that controls cyclin D1 expression and can partially rescue diabetic angiogenic cell bioavailability. The regulatory mechanism that they uncover is remarkable. On stimulation of CAC with IL-3, STAT5 transcription factors are activated. The phosphorylated STAT5s form homo- and heterodimeric complexes and translocate to the nucleus where they bind to specific DNA binding sites on PPARγ promoter and initiate transcription. This upregulation of PPARγ expression is a necessary step to promote entry into the cell cycle as knockdown of PPARγ expression ablates this response. Interestingly, activation of PPARγ signaling using specific endogenous ligands or synthetic agonists fails to mimic the response to IL-3, indicating that phosphorylation of STAT5 plays a pivotal role and acts as an upstream signal for activation of PPARγ in a ligand-independent manner. STAT5 and PPARγ will subsequently form a complex on the cyclin D1 promoter and induce cyclin D1 expression (Figure). Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. A, IL-3 stimulates STAT5 transcription factors. The phosphorylated STAT5s translocate to the nucleus where they bind to specific DNA binding sites on PPARgamma promoter and initiate transcription. B, STAT5 and PPARgamma subsequently form a complex on the cyclin D1 promoter, inducing cyclin D1 expression and progression into the cell cycle.These findings are rather intriguing given the nature of the transcription factors that are involved. STAT5 is activated in response to various hematopoietic cytokines. The STAT5ab−/− knockout mice are characterized by fetal anemia and increased apoptosis of fetal liver erythroid progenitors. Surprisingly, peripheral hematology of the STAT5ab−/− mice is not dramatically altered, although reductions in the numbers of IL-3 and GM-colony stimulating factor (CSF) responsive progenitors and IL-7 responsive B-lymphoid progenitors have been reported. Competitive repopulation assays demonstrated that bone marrow and fetal liver cells of STAT5ab−/− mice have a decreased repopulating activity in granulocyte, macrophage, erythroid, and B-lymphocytes populations, with no detectable engraftment of T lymphocytes, suggesting that STAT5 is required to sustain a hematopoietic reserve.10,11PPARγ on the other hand belongs to a family of nuclear receptors. After ligand binding, it heterodimerizes with the retinoid X receptor, binds to responsive DNA elements, and induces gene expression. Several reports have implicated PPARγ in the control of cell cycle, apoptosis, and biological events such as adipogenesis12 and bone homeostasis.13 In vitro studies using PPARγ agonists have suggested that it mediates the beneficial effects of statins14 and that its activation can increase the numbers and the functional capacity of circulating angiogenic cells from diabetic patients.15,16 In diabetes, PPARγ synthetic ligands such as thiazolidinedione drugs (TZD) are commonly used to improve insulin sensitivity and exert antiatherosclerotic and antiinflammatory effects.Interestingly, bidirectional crosstalk between STAT5 and PPAR signaling seems to control the response to growth hormone (GH). Both inhibition of PPARα transcriptional activity mediated by STAT5b and downregulation of STAT5b transcriptional activity by PPARα and PPARγ have been reported.17,18 The findings presented in this study further add to the complexity of STAT5 and PPAR partnership, as a novel direct physical interaction of the two factors in a transcriptional complex is demonstrated. The formation of this heterodimer seems to act as a switch, which either allows the expansion of circulating angiogenic cells or suspends it. As identifying ways of increasing the numbers of circulating angiogenic cells in diabetic patients is extremely important, it would be critical to define the other regulators that are involved in this interaction and that could potentially serve as targets for novel therapeutic interventions. Monitoring the effect of IL-3 treatment on other members of the PPAR family would also provide valuable insights into the biology of circulating angiogenic cells in diabetic patients. In conclusion, the present work brought forward a new concept that could stimulate further research and could lead to the design of novel more effective approaches capable of improving vascular function.Received October 18, 2008; revision accepted October 22, 2008. Sources of FundingThis work was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation and Oak Foundation.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Professor Qingbo Xu, Cardiovascular Division, King’s College London, 125 Cold Harbour Lane, London SE5 9NU, UK. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Feener EP, King GL. Vascular dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1997; 350 Suppl 1: SI9–SI13.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Schaper W, Buschmann I. Collateral circulation and diabetes. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2224–2226.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Waltenberger J, Lange J, Kranz A. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A-induced chemotaxis of monocytes is attenuated in patients with diabetes mellitus: A potential predictor for the individual capacity to develop collaterals. Circulation. 2000; 102: 185–190.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Hirschi KK, Ingram DA, Yoder MC. Assessing identity, phenotype, and fate of endothelial progenitor cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 1584–1595.LinkGoogle Scholar5 Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Kalka C, Gagne PJ, Jacobowitz GR, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2781–2786.LinkGoogle Scholar6 Fadini GP, Sartore S, Albiero M, Baesso I, Murphy E, Menegolo M, Grego F, Vigili de Kreutzenberg S, Tiengo A, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Number and function of endothelial progenitor cells as a marker of severity for diabetic vasculopathy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 2140–2146.LinkGoogle Scholar7 Caballero S, Sengupta N, Afzal A, Chang KH, Li Calzi S, Guberski DL, Kern TS, Grant MB. Ischemic vascular damage can be repaired by healthy, but not diabetic, endothelial progenitor cells. Diabetes. 2007; 56: 960–967.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Dentelli P, Trombetta A, Togliatto G, Zeoli A, Rosso A, Uberti B, Orso F, Taverna D, Pegoraro L, Brizzi MF. Formation of STAT5/PPARγ transcriptional complex modulates angiogenic cell bioavailability in diabetes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 114–120.LinkGoogle Scholar9 Zeoli A, Dentelli P, Rosso A, Togliatto G, Trombetta A, Damiano L, di Celle PF, Pegoraro L, Altruda F, Brizzi MF. Interleukin-3 promotes expansion of hemopoietic-derived CD45+ angiogenic cells and their arterial commitment via STAT5 activation. Blood. 2008; 112: 350–361.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Bunting KD, Bradley HL, Hawley TS, Moriggl R, Sorrentino BP, Ihle JN. Reduced lymphomyeloid repopulating activity from adult bone marrow and fetal liver of mice lacking expression of STAT5. Blood. 2002; 99: 479–487.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Schuringa JJ, Wu K, Morrone G, Moore MA. Enforced activation of STAT5A facilitates the generation of embryonic stem-derived hematopoietic stem cells that contribute to hematopoiesis in vivo. Stem Cells. 2004; 22: 1191–1204.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Lehrke M, Lazar MA. The many faces of PPARgamma. Cell. 2005; 123: 993–999.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Wan Y, Chong LW, Evans RM. PPAR-gamma regulates osteoclastogenesis in mice. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 1496–1503.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Yano M, Matsumura T, Senokuchi T, Ishii N, Murata Y, Taketa K, Motoshima H, Taguchi T, Sonoda K, Kukidome D, Takuwa Y, Kawada T, Brownlee M, Nishikawa T, Araki E. Statins activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent cyclooxygenase-2 expression in macrophages. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 1442–1451.LinkGoogle Scholar15 Pistrosch F, Herbrig K, Oelschlaegel U, Richter S, Passauer J, Fischer S, Gross P. PPARgamma-agonist rosiglitazone increases number and migratory activity of cultured endothelial progenitor cells. Atherosclerosis. 2005; 183: 163–167.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Wang CH, Ting MK, Verma S, Kuo LT, Yang NI, Hsieh IC, Wang SY, Hung A, Cherng WJ. Pioglitazone increases the numbers and improves the functional capacity of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am Heart J. 2006; 152: 1051 e1051–e1058.Google Scholar17 Shipley JM, Waxman DJ. Down-regulation of STAT5b transcriptional activity by ligand-activated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and PPARgamma. Mol Pharmacol. 2003; 64: 355–364.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Zhou YC, Waxman DJ. Cross-talk between janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha) signaling pathways. Growth hormone inhibition of pparalpha transcriptional activity mediated by stat5b. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 2672–2681.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Kim O and Song J (2020) The importance of BDNF and RAGE in diabetes-induced dementia, Pharmacological Research, 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105083, 160, (105083), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020. Beigneux A, Gin P, Davies B, Weinstein M, Bensadoun A, Fong L and Young S (2009) Highly Conserved Cysteines within the Ly6 Domain of GPIHBP1 Are Crucial for the Binding of Lipoprotein Lipase, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 10.1074/jbc.M109.046391, 284:44, (30240-30247), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009. January 2009Vol 29, Issue 1 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.178137PMID: 19092137 Originally publishedJanuary 1, 2009 PDF download Advertisement