Abstract:Study Design. Controlled laboratory study. Objective. To evaluate the influence of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with different Cobb angles and degenerative discs on the range of motion (ROM) of the lumbar endplates during functional weight-bearing activities in vivo. Summary of Background. DLS data might influence spinal stability and range of motion of the spine. Altered lumbar segment motion is thought to be related to disc degeneration. However, to date, no data have been reported on the motion patterns of the lumbar endplates in patients with DLS in vivo. Methods. We recorded 42 DLS patients with the apical disc at L2-L3 and L3-L4. Patients were divided into A group with a coronal Cobb angle >20° (number: 13; 62.00 ± 8.57 years old) and group B with a coronal Cobb angle <20° (number: 28; 65.79 ± 6.66 years old). Patients’ discs were divided into a degenerated disc group (III-V) and a nondegenerated disc group (I-II) according to the Pfirrmann classification. Computed tomography (CT) was performed on every subject to build 3-dimensional (3D) models of the lumbar vertebrae (L1–S1), and then the vertebras were matched according to the dual fluoroscopic imaging system. The kinematics of the endplate was compared between the different Cobb angle groups and the healthy group reported in a previous study and between the degenerative disc group and nondegenerative disc group by multiway analysis of variance. Results. Coupled translation at L5-S1 was higher than other levels during the three movements. During the flexion-extension of the trunk, around the anteroposterior axis, rotation in group A was higher than that in the control group at L2-L3 and L3-L4 ( 6.62 ± 3.61 mm vs 4.36 ± 2.55 mm, 5.01 ± 3.19 mm; P < 0.05 , P < 0.05 ). During the left-right bending of the trunk, around the mediolateral axis, rotations in groups A and B were higher than those in the control group at L5-S1 ( 17.52 ± 11.43 °, 17.25 ± 9.22 ° vs 10.08 ± 5.42 °; P < 0.05 , P < 0.05 ). During the left-right torsion, around the anteroposterior axis, rotation in group A was higher than that in group B and the control group at L2-3 ( 9.69 ± 5.94 ° vs 5.77 ± 4.02 °, 4.47 ± 2.00 °; P < 0.05 , P < 0.05 ). In patients with Cobb angle <20°, coupled translation was higher in the degenerated disc group than in the nondegenerated disc group, especially along the anteroposterior axis. Conclusion. An increase in the coupled rotation of the endplate at the scoliotic apical level in patients with DLS was related to a larger Cobb angle. Moreover, segments with degenerative discs had higher coupled translations in the anteroposterior direction than segments with nondegenerative discs in DLS patients with Cobb angle <20°. These data might provide clues regarding the etiology of DLS and the basis for operative planning.

Segmental Lumbar Rotation In Patients With Discogenic Low Back Pain During Functional Weight-Bearing Activities

Segmental Vertebral Motion in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: an in Vivo Study

Lumbar facet joint motion in patients with degenerative disc disease at affected and adjacent levels: an in vivo biomechanical study.

Effect of disc degeneration on lumbar segmental mobility analyzed by kinetic magnetic resonance imaging.

Kinematic Evaluation of Association between Disc Bulge Migration, Lumbar Segmental Mobility, and Disc Degeneration in the Lumbar Spine Using Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Investigation of Geometric Deformations of the Lumbar Disc During Axial Body Rotations

Motion of Lumbar Endplate in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients with Different Cobb Angle in Vivo: Reflecting the Biomechanics of the Lumbar Disc

An in vivo study exploring correlations between early-to-moderate disc degeneration and flexion mobility in the lumbar spine

Influences of Lumbar Disc Herniation on the Kinematics in Multi-Segmental Spine, Pelvis, and Lower Extremities During Five Activities of Daily Living

Kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous processes during axial rotation in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease lateral lumbar interbody fusion and intervention

[Vertebral in vivo motion of adjacent segments in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis].

Quantitative MRI and X-ray analysis of disc degeneration and paraspinal muscle changes in degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion

In Vivo Morphological Features of Human Lumbar Discs

Lumbar Facet Joint Motion in Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain

Motion in lumbar functional spine units during side bending and axial rotation moments depending on the degree of degeneration

How Does Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease Affect the Disc Deformation at the Cephalic Levels in Vivo?

The Characteristics of Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Lumbar Disc Degenerative Diseases

Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Range of Motion in Discogenic Back Pain

Dynamic Motion Characteristics of the Lower Lumbar Spine During Weight-Lifting Extension: Implication to Lumbar Pathology and Surgical Treatment

Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Lumbar Disc Degenerative Disease as an Implication of Low Back Pain: A Prospective Analysis