Title Hypoxia regulates sumoylation pathways in intervertebral disc cells : implications for hypoxic adaptations Running title Sumoylation in Intervertebral Disc Cells Author names and affiliations
Feng Wang,Feng Cai,Rui Shi,Ji-Nan Wei,Xiao-Tao Wu
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the hypoxic regulation of sumoylation pathways and cell viability in nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) cells. Design: Expression of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) molecules, SUMO E1 activating enzymes SAE1 and SAE2, SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme UBC9, and de-sumoylation enzyme SENP1 was immunolocalized in rat intervertebral disc (IVD) cells. NP and AF cells were cultured in hypoxia and cell viability was evaluated by M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT quantifying cell proliferation, cellular senescence, apoptosis, and cell cycle distribution. Hypoxic regulation of sumoylation pathways was studied by analyzing the transcription and expression of SUMO molecules and sumoylation enzymes. Loss of function study using SENP-1 siRNA was performed to investigate the regulatory role of sumoylation on the function of HIF-1α and the hypoxic tolerance of IVD cells. Results: Sumoylation pathways were expressed in IVD cells and localized predominantly in nuclei. Both NP and AF cells maintained viability under hypoxia and upregulated the expression of SENP1. In NP cells hypoxia transiently increased the expression of SUMO-1, SUMO-2/3, SAE2, and UBC9, whereas SUMO-1 was elevated while SUMO-2/3, SAE1, SAE2, and UBC9 was reduced by low oxygen tensions in AF cells. Although downregulation of SENP1 decreased the transcriptional activity of HIF-1α, the viability of disc cells showed no significant loss under hypoxia. Conclusions: NP and AF cells equally tolerate oxygen deficiency, but differently regulate the sumoylation pathways under hypoxia. The distinct sumoylation dynamics may help extend our understanding of the cell-specific regulation of the molecular basis that promotes cell survival in the hypoxic intervertebral disc. Keyword Intervertebral Disc; Hypoxia; Sumoylation; Posttranslational Modulation M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction 1 Intervertebral disc (IVD) connects adjacent vertebr a and functions to permit 2 segmental motion and absorb mechanical loadings . A normal disc is composed of a 3 central gelatinous nucleus pulposus (NP) and an out er concentric annulus fibrosus 4 (AF). The most unique aspect of disc biology is tha t nourishing blood vessels merely 5 reach to the superficial region of cartilaginous en dplate (CEP) and the outer surface of 6 AF, providing disc cells with limited supply of oxy gen and nutrition 2, . In the past 7 decades, a large number of studies have focused on how resident disc cells respond 8 and adapt to the avascular disc niches , aiming to understand the molecular basis 9 that underlies IVD degeneration. 10 It has been revealed that NP cells constitutively e xpr ss hypoxia inducible factor 1 α 11 (HIF-1α) and stabilize the protein expression even under n ormal oxygen tensions . By 12 transactivating glycolysis-related genes, such as g lucose transporter (GLUT)-1 and 13 GLUT-3, the oxemic-independent stabilization of HIF -1α is presumed to render NP 14 cells metabolic adaptations to the deficiency of ox ygen and nutrition . Moreover, 15 while the pro-survival galectin-3 and vascular endo thelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) 16 are activated in NP cells under hypoxia 11, , the pro-apoptotic glycogen synthase 17 kinase 3β (GSK-3β) is inhibited by hypoxia , which may work cooperatively to 18 maintain NP cell viability under low oxygen tension s. However, although AF is also 19 removed from blood supply , our understanding of the response of AF cells to oxemic 20 stresses is quite limited. Based on the fact that A F has unique embryonic origin 13 and 21 demonstrates different expression pattern of HIF-1 α , we hypothesize that AF cells 22 might differ from NP cells in the capacity and mech anism to tolerate hypoxia. 23 Posttranslational modifications, such as ubiquitina tion, acetylation, hydroxylation, 24 and sumouylation play critical roles in regulating the biological activities of various 25 encoded proteins . Conjugating small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUM O) to specific 26 protein (sumoylation) is a newly discovered posttra nsl tional modulation that 27 participates in nearly all aspects of cellular phys iology . From yeast to mammal 28 the sumoylation pathways are evolutionarily conserv ed and function through a related 29 enzymatic cascade, which involves the sequential ac tion of E1 activating enzymes 30 M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT SAE1 and SAE2, an E2 conjugating enzyme UBC9, and/o r E3 protein ligase (not 31 mandatory) . While the sumoylated proteins change their intrac ellular localizations, 32 bioactivities, and interactions with DNA or other p oteins, Sentrin/SUMO-specific 33 proteases (SENP) de-conjugate SUMO from their subst rate , making the sumoylation 34 process highly reversible and dynamic . 35 Unlike ubiquitination, which targets proteins prima rily for degradation, the 36 posttranslational modulation by sumoylation regulat es the bioactivities, intracellular 37 localizations, as well as protein to protein/DNA in teractions of the sumoylated 38 substrates . In most cases, SUMO molecules targets proteins th at s are consensus 39 SUMO-acceptor site sequence ψKX(D/E), in which ψ is large hydrophobic residue . 40 Ever since the identification of the first SUMO tar geted protein RanGAP1 in 1997 , 41 hundreds of functionally diverse substrates have be n found to be conjugated by 42 SUMO under both physiological and pathological cond itions, including the 43 hypoxia-responsive gene products such as HIF-1 α, HIF-2α, HIF-1β, GLUT-1, 44 Prolyl Hydroxylases 3 PHD3 , and IkBα. Since all of these SUMO substrates 45 respond to and are regulated by hypoxia in NP cells 5, 7, 9, 25, 26 , it is not unseasonable to 46 presume that the sumolyation mechanism might be inv olved in the adaptation of IVD 47 cells to the oxemic and metabolic challenges. 48 The major objective of this study was to compare th e hypoxic tolerance between 49 NP and AF cells and to investigate whether sumoylat ion is dynamically regulated in 50 the cells of IVD. Our results show that both NP and AF cells equally tolerate low 51 oxygen tensions, but demonstrate substantive differ ences in the hypoxic regulation of 52 SUMO and SUMO pathway enzymes. These findings may h elp provide new and 53 posttranslational perspective to understand the cel l-sp cific regulation of the 54 molecular basis that promotes cell survival within the avascular IVD. 55