Human Homolog of Drosophila Hairy and Enhancer of Split 1, Hes1, Negatively Regulates Δ-Catenin (CTNND2) Expression in Cooperation with E2F1 in Prostate Cancer

Jian-Ping Lu,Jiao Zhang,Kwonseop Kim,Thomas C Case,Robert J Matusik,Yan-hua Chen,Michael Wolfe,Jongdee Nopparat,Qun Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-304
IF: 37.3
2010-01-01
Molecular Cancer
Abstract:Background Neuronal synaptic junction protein δ-catenin ( CTNND2 ) is often overexpressed in prostatic adenocarcinomas but the mechanisms of its activation are unknown. To address this question, we studied the hypothesis that Hes1, human homolog of Drosophila H airy and e nhancer of s plit (Hes) 1, is a transcriptional repressor of δ-catenin expression and plays an important role in molecular carcinogenesis. Results We identified that, using a δ-catenin promoter reporter assay, Hes1, but not its inactive mutant, significantly repressed the upregulation of δ-catenin-luciferase activities induced by E2F1. Hes1 binds directly to the E-boxes on δ-catenin promoter and can reduce the expression of δ-catenin in prostate cancer cells. In prostate cancer CWR22-Rv1 and PC3 cell lines, which showed distinct δ-catenin overexpression, E2F1 and Hes1 expression pattern was altered. The suppression of Hes1 expression, either by γ-secretase inhibitors or by siRNA against Hes1, increased δ-catenin expression. γ-Secretase inhibition delayed S/G2-phase transition during cell cycle progression and induced cell shape changes to extend cellular processes in prostate cancer cells. In neuroendocrine prostate cancer mouse model derived allograft NE-10 tumors, δ-catenin showed an increased expression while Hes1 expression was diminished. Furthermore, E2F1 transcription was very high in subgroup of NE-10 tumors in which Hes1 still displayed residual expression, while its expression was only moderately increased in NE-10 tumors where Hes1 expression was completely suppressed. Conclusion These studies support coordinated regulation of δ-catenin expression by both the activating transcription factor E2F1 and repressive transcription factor Hes1 in prostate cancer progression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?