Hollow Cages Versus Space-Filling Structures for Medium-Sized Gold Clusters: the Spherical Aromaticity of the Au50 Cage.

Jl Wang,J Jellinek,J Zhao,Zf Chen,Rb King,Pv Schleyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp052414q
2005-01-01
Abstract:Candidates for the lowest energy structures of medium-sized Au(n), n = 32, 38, 44, 50, and 56, clusters were evaluated using gradient-corrected DFT computations. Both hollow cage and space-filling conformations were considered. The cages were constructed using fullerene-based templates. The space-filling structures were generated by employing a genetic algorithm. We have found that the space-filling isomers were lower in energy except for two notable cases. Like Au(32) [Johansson, M. P.; Sundholm, D.; Vaara, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2678], a hollow cage configuration of Au(50) is more stable than its alternative space-filling isomeric forms. The unusual stabilities of the cage Au(32) and Au(50) can be attributed to spherical aromaticity; both exhibit large negative nucleus-independent chemical shifts and exceptionally large HOMO-LUMO gaps.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?