Simplified care-pathway selection for nonspecialist practice: the GLOBAL Primary Biliary Cholangitis Study Group Age, Bilirubin, Alkaline phosphatase risk assessment tool
Carla F Murillo Perez,Aliya Gulamhusein,Marco Carbone,Palak J Trivedi,Adriaan J van der Meer,Christophe Corpechot,Pier Maria Battezzati,Willem J Lammers,Nora Cazzagon,Annarosa Floreani,Albert Parés,Frederik Nevens,Ana Lleo,Marlyn J Mayo,Kris V Kowdley,Cyriel Y Ponsioen,George N Dalekos,Nikolaos K Gatselis,Douglas Thorburn,Andrew L Mason,Harry Janssen,Xavier Verhelst,Tony Bruns,Keith D Lindor,Olivier Chazouillères,Pietro Invernizzi,Bettina E Hansen,Gideon M Hirschfield,GLOBAL PBC Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002029
2021-12-01
Abstract:Background: Opportunity to redefine the care journeys for those living with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) includes facilitating access to enhanced (PBC-dedicated) programmes by nonspecialist risk 'flagging' of patients. Objective: To develop a nonexpert PBC stratification tool to help care pathway choices (standard vs. enhanced) choices in PBC. Methods: We included ursodeoxycholic acid-treated patients with PBC from the Global PBC Study Group. The performance of baseline and 1-year clinical markers with transplant-free survival was assessed to develop the 'ABA' tool using Age (A), Bilirubin (B), and Alkaline phosphatase (A). Added value of fibrosis estimation was assessed. Results: 'ABA' classification mapped three risk groups (n = 2226): low [Age > 50 years, bilirubin ≤ 1 × ULN, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 3 × ULN], high (Age ≤ 50 years, bilirubin > 1 × ULN, ALP > 3 × ULN), and intermediate (other). Transplant-free survival at 10 years in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 89, 77, and 59% at baseline and 86, 76, and 40% at 1 year, respectively. We propose that high-risk patients at baseline be directly triaged to enhanced (PBC-dedicated) care and the remaining be reassessed at 1 year. Modelling showed after 1 year 46% patients were proposed to enhanced care and 54% to standard care. The 'ABA' mapped pathways facilitated identification of patients at risk based on a young age, as compared to traditional liver biochemical stratification. In patients proposed to standard care, estimated fibrosis stage had ongoing prognostic value. Conclusion: Nonspecialist use of the 'ABA' risk tool could prioritize care journey choices for patients with PBC.