Abstract:We describe several experiments on contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system. As test stimuli we used characters that are often employed in optometric practice for testing visual acuity: Landolt C's, Snellen E's, and rectangular gratings. We tested several hypotheses that have been put forward to explain contour interaction and crowding effects. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, Landolt C's were the test stimuli, and bars, or Landolt C's, or gratings served as distractors. In Experiment 1, we showed that neither scale invariance nor spatial frequency selectivity is a characteristic of foveal crowding effects. These results allowed us to conclude that mechanisms other than lateral masking contribute to observers' performance in 'crowded' tasks. R. F. Hess, S. C. Dakin, and N. Kappor (2000) suggested that the spatial frequency band most appropriate for target recognition is shifted by the surrounding bars to higher spatial frequencies that cannot be resolved by observers. Our Experiment 2 rejects this hypothesis as the experimental data do not follow theoretical predictions. In Experiment 3, we employed Snellen E's, both as test stimuli and as distractors. The masking functions were similar to those measured in Experiment 1 when the test Landolt C was surrounded by Landolt C's. In Experiment 4, we extended the range of test stimuli to rectangular gratings; same-frequency or high-frequency gratings were distractors. In this case, if the distracting gratings had random orientation from trial to trial, the critical spacing was twice larger than in the first three experiments. If the orientation of the distractors was fixed during the whole experiment, the critical spacing was similar to that measured in the first three experiments. We suggest that the visual system can use different mechanisms for the discrimination of different test stimuli in the presence of particular surround. Different receptive fields with different spatial characteristics can be employed. To explain why crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system are not scale invariant, we suggest that a range of stimuli, slightly varying in size, may all be processed by the same neural channel--the channel with the smallest receptive fields of the visual system.

Classifying Illusory Contours: Edges Defined by "pacman" and Monocular Tokens.

Patterns That Impair Discrimination of Line Orientation in Human Vision

Psychophysical Evidence for Competition Between Real and Illusory Contour Processing

Foveal contour interaction: detection and discrimination

A crescent edge-length illusion induced by object-based perception

A quantitative analysis of tilt in the Café Wall illusion: a bioplausible model for foveal and peripheral vision

The adaptation to Kanizsa-type illusory contours

Both Cognitive Factors and Local Inhibition Mediate the Effect of a Surrounding Frame in Visual Search for Oriented Bars

Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system

Investigating Salience Mechanisms by Using the Effects of Surrounding Frame on the Tilted-Vertical Asymmetry in Visual Search

The Poggendorff Illusion Driven By Real And Illusory Contour: Behavioral And Neural Mechanisms

A Novel Dynamically Induced 'pure Illusory Contour'

Interference of Illusory Contour Perception by a Distractor

Constant contour integration in peripheral vision for stimuli with good Gestalt properties.

A functional circuitry for edge-induced brightness perception

V1 mechanisms and some figure–ground and border effects

Building Surfaces from Borders in Areas 17 and 18 of the Cat

Contour Integration, Attentional Cuing, and Conscious Awareness: an Investigation on the Processing of Collinear and Orthogonal Contours.

Awareness-dependent Distribution of Visual Bottom-up Attention

Real and illusory contour processing in area V1 of the primate: a cortical balancing act.

The tilt illusion arises from an efficient reallocation of neural coding resources at the contextual boundary