Abstract:Publications by Chinese researchers in scientific journals have dramatically increased over the past decade; however, academic misconduct also becomes more prevalent in the country. The aim of this prospective study was to understand the perceptions of Chinese biomedical researchers towards academic misconduct and the trend from 2010 to 2015. A questionnaire comprising 10 questions was designed and then validated by ten biomedical researchers in China. In the years 2010 and 2015, respectively, the questionnaire was sent as a survey to biomedical researchers at teaching hospitals, universities, and medical institutes in mainland China. Data were analyzed by the Chi squared test, one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc test, or Spearman’s rank correlation method, where appropriate. The overall response rates in 2010 and 2015 were 4.5% (446/9986) and 5.5% (832/15,127), respectively. Data from 15 participants in 2010 were invalid, and analysis was thus performed for 1263 participants. Among the participants, 54.7% thought that academic misconduct was serious-to-extremely serious, and 71.2% believed that the Chinese authorities paid no or little attention to the academic misconduct. Moreover, 70.2 and 65.2% of participants considered that the punishment for academic misconduct at the authority and institution levels, respectively, was not appropriate or severe enough. Inappropriate authorship and plagiarism were the most common forms of academic misconduct. The most important factor underlying academic misconduct was the academic assessment system, as judged by 50.7% of the participants. Participants estimated that 40.1% (39.8 ± 23.5% in 2010; 40.2 ± 24.5% in 2015) of published scientific articles were associated with some form of academic misconduct. Their perceptions towards academic misconduct had not significantly changed over the 5 years. Reform of the academic assessment system should be the fundamental approach to tackling this problem in China.

Chinese Researchers Debate Rash of Plagiarism Cases

The Reasons and Countermeasures of Chinese College Students ' unintentional Plagiarism

Empirical Analysis On Chinese Academic Plagiarism

Current concepts of metabolic functional imaging with positron emitters.

On Plagiarism in Ancient China

Discussion on How to Eradicate Plagiarism in Microcomputer Experiment

How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article

Research on Anti-Plagiarism System and the Law of Plagiarism

High resolution of racemic phenylalanine with dication imidazolium-based chiral ionic liquids in a solid-liquid two-phase system.

Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe

Residues in the Second Cysteine-rich Region of Protein Kinase C δ Relevant to Phorbol Ester Binding as Revealed by Site-directed Mutagenesis (*)

High retraction rate of Chinese articles: it is time to do something about academic misconduct

Chinese Undergraduate Efl Learners' Perceptions Of Plagiarism And Use Of Citations In Course Papers

Plagiarism in Non-Anglophone Countries: a Cross-sectional Survey of Researchers and Journal Editors

The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region

Ambiguity in Ethical Standards: Global Versus Local Science in Explaining Academic Plagiarism

Who should be held accountable? An analysis of academic misconduct cases in Chinese higher education and the challenges of the transformative process

Causes and countermeasures of research-integrity problems in the new era: From the perspective of the culture of science

A meta-analytic approach to ilioinguinal nerve excision or preservation during open inguinal hernia repair.

Internal and external factors of plagiarism: Evidence from Chinese public sector universities

Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010